Page 203 - Read Online
P. 203

Page 10 of 11                                       Cicero et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:25  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2018.012

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Kane CJ, Mallin K, Ritchey J, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR. Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data
                   Base. Cancer 2008;113:78-83.
               2.   Uzosike AC, Patel HD, Alam R, Schwen ZR, Gupta M, et al. Growth Kinetics of Small Renal Masses on Active
                   Surveillance:Variability and Results from the DISSRM Registry. J Urol 2018;199:641-8.
               3.   Bertolotto M, Catalano O. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: past, present, and future. Ultrasound Clin 2009;4:339-67.
               4.   Oh TH, Lee YH, Seo IY. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small renal masses. Korean Journal of Urology.
                   Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Small Renal Masses. Korean J Urol 2014;55:587-92.
               5.   Bertolotto M, Derchi LE, Cicero C, Iannelli M. Renal Masses as Characterized by Ultrasound Contrast. Ultrasound Clin 2013;8:581-92.
               6.   Barozzi L, Valentino M, Bertolotto M, Pavlica P. Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal diseases. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010;82:232-7.
               7.   Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical
                   Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017. Ultraschall Med 2018;39:e2-44.
               8.   Bertolotto M, Siracusano S, Cicero C, Iannelli M, Silvestri T, et al. Cryotherapy of Renal Lesions: Enhancement on Contrast-
                   Enhanced Sonography on Postoperative Day 1 Does Not Imply Viable Tissue Persistence. J Ultrasound Med 2017;36:301-10.
               9.   Correas JM, Claudon M, Tranquart F, Hélénon AO. The kidney: imaging with microbubble contrast agents. Ultrasound Q 2006;22:53-66.
               10.  Mazziotti S, Zimbaro F, Pandolfo A, Racchiusa S, Settineri N, et al. Usefulness of contrast-en-hanced ultrasonography in the
                   diagnosis of renal pseudotumors. Abdom Imaging 2010;35:241-5.
               11.  Barr RG, Peterson C, Hindi A. Evaluation of indeterminate renal massess with contrast-enhanced US: a diagnostic performance study.
                   Radiology 2014;271:133-42.
               12.  Sanz E, Hevia V, Gomez V, Álvarez S, Fabuel JJ, et al. Renal complex cystic masses: usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound
                   (CEUS) in their assessment and its agreement with computed tomography. Curr Urol Rep 2016;17:89.
               13.  Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Cioffi V, Rossi A, Baratella E, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography with unenhanced sonography
                   and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1239-49.
               14.  Clevert DA, Minaifar N, Weckbach S, Jung EM, Stock K, et al. Multislice computed tomography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound
                   in evaluation of complex cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification system. Clin Hemorheol Micro 2008;39:171-8.
               15.  Park BK, Kim B, Kim SH, Ko K, Lee HM, et al. Assessment of cystic renal masses based on Bosniak classification: comparison of CT
                   and contrast-enhanced US. Eur J Radiol 2007;61:310-4.
               16.  Harkanyi Z. Potential applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in pediatric patients. Ultrasound Clin North Am 2013;8:403-22.
               17.  Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Zimbaro G, Settineri N, Magno C, et al. Complex Cystic Renal Masses: Characterization with Contrast-
                   enhanced US. Radiology 2007;243:158-65.
               18.  Bertolotto M, Cicero C, Perrone R, Degrassi F, Cacciato F, et al. Renal masses with equivocal enhamcement at CT: characterization
                   with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:W557-65.
               19.  Di Vece F, Tombesi P, Ermili F, Sartori S. Management of incidental renal masses: time to consider contrast-enhanced
                   ultrasonography. Ultrasound 2016;24:34-40.
               20.  Helck A, D’Anastasi M, Notohamiprodjo M, Thieme S, Sommer W, et al. Multimodality imaging using ultrasound image fusion in
                   renal lesions. Clin Hemorheol Micro 2012;50:79-89.
               21.  Heilbrun ME, Remer EM, Casalino DD, Beland MD, Bishoff JT, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria indeterminate renal mass. J Am
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208