Page 137 - Read Online

Page 8 of 8 Shibao et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:16 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.01

25. Seesing MFJ, Gisbertz SS, Goense L, van Hillegersberg R, Kroon HM, et al. A propensity score matched analysis of open versus
minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy in the netherlands. Ann Surg 2017;266:839-46.
26. Stark SP, Romberg MS, Pierce GE, Hermreck AS, Jewell WR, et al. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma
of the distal esophagus and cardia. Am J Surg 1996;172:478-81; discussion 481-2.
27. Yamamoto M, Weber JM, Karl RC, Meredith KL. Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer: review of the literature and
institutional experience. Cancer Control 2013;20:130-7.
28. Maas KW, Biere SS, Scheepers JJ, Gisbertz SS, van-der-Peet DL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal
and junction cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2012;104:197-202.
29. Santillan AA, Farma JM, Meredith KL, Shah NR, Kelley ST., Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc
Netw. 2008;6:879-84.
30. Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, Van Hillegersberg R. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy
for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir 2009;64:135-46.
31. Safranek PM, Cubitt J, Booth MI, Dehn TC. Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg
2010;97:1845-53.
32. Singh RK, Pham TH, Diggs BS, Perkins S, Hunter JG. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to
open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma. Arch Surg 2011;146:711-4.
33. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-
year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg 2017;266:232-36.
34. Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open
techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 2012;16:486-94.
35. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy
for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 2012;255:197-203.
36. Zhou C, Zhang L, Wang H, Ma X, Shi B, et al. Superiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy in reducing in-hospital mortality of
patients with resectable oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS one 2015;10:e0132889.
37. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for
patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887-92.
38. Mariette C, Meunier B, Pezet D, Dalban C, Collet D, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with
oesophageal cancer: a multicenter, open- label, randomized phase III controlled trial, the MIRO trial. J Clinic Oncol 2015;33:suppl 5.
39. Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Roig J, Bonavina L, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimally
invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg 2015;39:1986-993.
40. Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer:
a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:1281-8.
41. Yerokun BA, Sun Z, Yang CJ, Gulack BC, Speicher PJ, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a
population-based analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:416-23.
42. Shanmugasundaram R, Hopkins R, Neeman T, Beenen E, Fergusson J, et al. Minimally invasive McKeown's vs open oesophagectomy
for cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019;45:941-9.
43. Seto Y, Mori K, Aikou S. Robotic surgery for esophageal cancer: merits and demerits. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2017;14:193-8.