Page 26 - Read Online
P. 26

Page 8 of 10                                            Arslan et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:4  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2017.31


               Final approval of the version to be published: Özgök A, Arslan ME

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               There are no conflicts of interest.


               Patient consent
               Not applicable.

               Ethics approval
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2018.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Cockcroft JO, Berry CB, McGrath JS, Daugherty MO. Anesthesia for major urological surgery. Anesthesiol Clin 2015;33:165-72.
               2.   Arunkumar R, Rebello E, Owusu-Agyemang P. Anaesthetic techniques for unique cancer surgery procedures. Best Pract Res Clin
                   Anaesthesiol 2013;27:513-26.
               3.   Falabella A, Moore-Jeffries E, Sullivan MJ, Nelson R, Lew M. Cardiac function during steep Trendelenburg position and CO2
                   pneumoperitoneum for robotic-assisted prostatectomy: a trans-oesophageal Doppler probe study. Int J Med Robot 2007;3:312-5.
               4.   Modi PK, Kwon YS, Patel N, Dinizo M, Farber N, Zhao PT, Salmasi A, Parihar J, Ginsberg S, Ha YS, Kim IY. Safety of robot-assisted
                   radical prostatectomy with pneumoperitoneum of 20 mmHg: a study of 751 patients. J Endourol 2015;29:1148-51.
               5.   Kalmar AF, Foubert JF, Hendrickx JFA, Mottrie A, Absalom A, Mortier EP, Struys MM. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and
                   CO2 pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth
                   2010;104:433-9.
               6.   Awad H, Walker CM, Shaikh M, Dimitrova GT, Abaza R, O’Hara J. Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the
                   literature. J Clin Anesth 2012;24:494-504.
               7.   Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Kashfi A, Kraus T, Büchler MW. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide
                   insufflation. Dig Surg 2004;21:95 -105.
               8.   Chen Y, Xie Y, Xue Y, Wang B, Jin X. Effects of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block on autonomic nervous function during CO2-
                   pneumoperitoneum: a randomized double-blind control trial. J Clin Anesth 2016;32:255-61.
               9.   Dal Moro F, Crestani A, Valotto C, Guttilla A, Soncin R, Mangano A, Zattoni F. Anesthesiologic effects of transperitoneal versus
                   extraperitoneal approach during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Braz J Urol
                   2015;41:466-72.
               10.  Meininger D, Byhahn C, Wolfram M, Mierdl S, Kessler P, Westphal K. Prolonged intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal insufflation of
                   carbon dioxide in patients undergoing totally endoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Surg Endosc 2004;18:829-33.
               11.  Gainsburg DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol 2012;78:596-604.
               12.  Gerges FJ, Kanazi GE, Jabbour-Khoury SI. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth 2006;18:67-78.
               13.  O’Malley C, Cunningham AJ. Physiologic changes during laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2001;1:1-18.
               14.  Khetarpal R, Bali K, Chatrath V, Bansal D. Anesthetic considerations in the patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing
                   laparoscopic surgeries. Anesth Essays Res 2016;10:7-12.
               15.  Lian M, Zhao X, Wang H, Chen L, Li S. Respiratory dynamics and dead space to tidal volume ratio of volume-controlled versus pressure-
                   controlled ventilation during prolonged gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3605-13.
               16.  Kilic OF, Börgers A, Köhne W, Musch M, Kröpfl D, Groeben H. Effects of steep Trendelenburg position for robotic-assisted prostatectomies
                   on intra and extrathoracic airways in patients with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Br J Anaesth 2015;114:70-6.
               17.  Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, Wiklund P, Odeberg-Wernerman S. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic
                   radical prostatectomy in 45o Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg 2011;113:1069-75.
               18.  Odeberg S, Ljungqvist O, Sevenberg T, Gannedahl P, Bäckdahl M, von Rosen A, Sollevi A. Haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum
                   and the influence of posture during anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:276-83.
               19.  Irwin MG, Wong SSC. Anaesthesia and minimally invasive surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care Med 2015;16:17-20.
               20.  Yong J, Hibbert P, Runciman WB, Coventry BJ. Bradycardia as an early warning sign for cardiac arrest during routine laparoscopic surgery.
                   Int J Qual Health Care 2015;27:473-8.
               21.  Rosendal C, Markin S, Hien MD, Motsch J, Roggenbach J. Cardiac and hemodynamic consequences during capnoperitoneum and steep
                   Trendelenburg positioning: lessons learned from robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth 2014;26:383-9.
               22.  Sonny A, Sessler DI, You J, Kashy BK, Sarwar S, Singh AK, Sale S, Alfirevic A, Duncan AE. The response to Trendelenburg position is
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31