Page 111 - Read Online
P. 111
Page 6 of 12 Young et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:16 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2017.50
Gestational diabetes
Study name OR
Abenhaim 1.26
Amsalem 0.24
Berlac 1.14
Ducarme 0.13
Johannsson 0.26
Kjaer 1.26
Lapolla 0.06
Parker 0.3
Patel 0.82
Overall 1.05
0
0.5 0.75 1.5 2
Less likely for BS Pt More likely for BS Pt Graph generated by DistillerSR
1
Figure 4. Gestational diabetes
IUGR
Study name OR
Abenhaim 1.97
Amsalem 1
Parker 2.68
Patel 5.12
Santuli 15.38
Overall 2.1
0
0.5 0.75 1.5 2
Less likely for BS Pt More likely for BS Pt Graph generated by DistillerSR
1
Figure 5. Intra-uterine growth restriction
The assisted delivery review included 7 papers [14,17-19,22-24] and had 16,574 women in the control population
and 298 women in the post-surgical population. As compared to the control population, there was a
reduction in the rates of assisted deliveries in the post-surgical population (OR 0.807, 95% CI 0.717-0.917,
P = 0.000) [Figure 9].
The premature delivery review included 9 papers [13,14,16,19-21,23-25] and had 19,963 women in the control
population and 1051 women in the post-surgical population. As compared to the control population, there
was no difference in the rates of Premature Delivery found in the post-surgical population (OR 0.982, 95%
CI 0.918-1.050, P = 0.591) [Figure 10].