Page 46 - Read Online
P. 46

Falavolti et al.                                                                                                                                                                  Early vascular control in robotic surgery

           cases of pelvic ischemia manifestation. Nevertheless,   prostate for prostate greater than 80 mL. Urology 2010;76:958-61.
           robotic-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy is   5.   Alivizatos G, Skolarikos  A, Chalikopoulos D, Papachristou C,
           considered a new surgical approach and prospective    Sopilidis O, Dellis  A,  Kastriotis I,  Deliveliotis  C. Transurethral
                                                                 photoselective  vaporization  versus transvesical  open  enucleation
           future comparative studies are needed  to determine   for prostatic  adenomas  > 80 mL:  12-mo results of a randomized
           the efficacy of this procedure. Our paper showed the   prospective study. Eur Urol 2008;54:427-37.
           preliminary  results of robotic assisted laparoscopic   6.   Sergi F, Falavolti C, Bove  AM, Buscarini M. Robotic-assisted
           simple  prostatectomy with temporary  internal  iliac   laparoscopic  simple  prostatectomy  and  bladder  diverticulectomy
           arteries clamping  and we believe that this approach   with temporary clamping of internal iliac  arteries.  J Robot  Surg
           could be a safe surgical option for the treatment of large   2014;8:81-3.
           prostatic adenomas (> 80 mL) reducing the estimated   7.   Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, Garcia A, Banda E, Miranda M,
                                                                 Fagin R. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol 2008;179:513-5.
           blood loss and decreasing needed postoperative care.  8.   Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, de
                                                                 la Rosette JJ. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-
           In conclusion, the surgical treatment of large prostatic   up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign
           adenomas remains a controversial issue. The minimally   prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol 2004;46:547-54.
           invasive approach for BPH is replacing open surgery.   9.   Tubaro A, Carter S, Hind A, Vicentini C, Miano L. A prospective study
           Both laparoscopic  and  robotic  techniques  have     of the safety and efficacy of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy in
           benefits.  We propose robotic assisted laparoscopic   patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2001;166:172-6.
           simple prostatectomy  with early vascular control as   10.  Jhanwar  A, Sinha RJ, Bansal  A, Prakash G, Singh K, Singh  V.
                                                                 Outcomes of transurethral resection and holmium laser enucleation in
           technique able to associate the benefits of minimally   more than 60 g of prostate: a prospective randomized study. Urol Ann
           invasive surgery with those of minimal estimated blood   2017;9:45-50.
           loss. We  believe that this approach could be a safe   11.  Naspro R, Gomez Sancha F, Manica M, Meneghini A, Ahyai S, Aho
           surgical  option for the treatment of large  prostatic   T, Fiori C,  Vavassori I, DA Pozzo LF, Pansadoro  V, Montorsi F,
           adenomas (>  80 mL) especially for  surgeons at  the   Herrmann TR. From “gold standard” resection to reproducible “future
           beginning of their learning curve.                    standard” endoscopic enucleation  of the prostate (EEP): what we
                                                                 know about anatomical enucleation. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2017; doi:
                                                                 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02834-X.
           Authors’ contributions                             12.  Reich O, Gratzke C, Stief CG. Techniques and long-term results of
           Original idea and data collection: C. Falavolti       surgical procedures for BPH. Eur Urol 2006;49:970-8.
           Data and statistical analysis: T. Petitti          13.  Mariano MB, Graziottin TM, Tefilli MV. Laparoscopic prostatectomy
           Drafting of the text: M. Buscarini                    with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia.  J Urol
                                                                 2002;167:2528-9.
           Financial support and sponsorship                  14.  Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Renard J, Grande S, Musso F, Cossu M, Vacca
           None.                                                 F, Scarpa RM. Transcapsular adenomectomy (Millin): a comparative
                                                                 study, extraperitoneal  laparoscopy  versus open surgery.  Eur Urol
                                                                 2006;49:120-6.
           Conflicts of interest                              15.  McCullough  TC, Heldwein  FL, Soon SJ, Galiano  M, Barret  E,
           There are no conflicts of interest.                   Cathelineau X, Prapotnich D, Vallancien G, Rozet F. Laparoscopic
                                                                 versus open simple  prostatectomy:  an evaluation  of morbidity.  J
           Patient consent                                       Endourol 2009;23:129-33.
           The informed consent was obtained from all patients.  16.  Oktay B, Koc G, Vuruskan H, Danisoglu ME, Kordan Y. Laparoscopic
                                                                 extraperitoneal simple prostatectomy for benign prostate hyperplasia:
           Ethics approval                                       a two-year experience. Urol J 2011;8:107-12.
           This article is waived for ethical approval in authors’   17.  Yuh B, Laungani R, Perlmutter  A, Eun D, Peabody JO,  Mohler
           affiliations.                                         JL,  Stricker  H, Guru  KA.  Robot-assisted  Millin’s retropubic
                                                                 prostatectomy: case series. Can J Urol 2008;15:4101-5.
                                                              18.  John H, Bucher C, Engel N, Fischer B, Fehr JL. Preperitoneal robotic
           REFERENCES                                            prostate adenomectomy. Urology 2009;73:811-5.
                                                              19.  Vora  A, Mittal  S, Hwang J, Bandi  G. Robot-assisted  simple
           1.   Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher   prostatectomy: multi-institutional outcomes for glands larger than 100
               S,  Mamoulakis C,  Oelke M,  Tikkinen KA,  Gravas S. EAU   grams. J Endourol 2012;26:499-502.
               guidelines on management on benign prostatic hyperplasia.  Eur   20.  Matei DV, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, Spinelli M, Musi G, Melegari S,
               Urol 2015;67:1099-109.                            Galasso G, Detti S, de Cobelli O. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy
           2.   John H, Bucher C, Engel N, Fischer B, Fehr JL. Preperitoneal robotic   (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int 2012;110:E972-9.
               prostate adenomectomy. Urology 2009;73:811-5.  21.  Shaheen A, Quinlan D. Feasibility of open simple prostatectomy with
           3.   Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Karl A, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief   early vascular control. BJU Int 2004;93:349-52.
               CG, Reich O. Complications and early postoperative outcome after   22.  Pokorny M, Novara G, Geurts N, Dovey Z, De Groote R, Ploumidis
               open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement:   A,  Schatteman  P, de  Naeyer  G, Mottrie  A. Robot-assisted  simple
               results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 2007;177:1419-22.  prostatectomy  for treatment  of lower urinary tract symptoms
           4.   Ou R, You M, Tang P, Chen H, Deng X, Xie K. A randomized trial   secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique  and
               of transvesical  prostatectomy  versus transurethral  resection  of the   outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre. Eur Urol 2015;68:451-7.
                          Mini-invasive Surgery ¦ Volume 1 ¦ March 31, 2017                                39
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51