Page 36 - Read Online
P. 36

Kitamura et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:44  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.27  Page 9 of 9

               18.      Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients receiving a magnetic sphincter augmentation
                   device for gastroesophageal reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:671-7.  DOI  PubMed
               19.      Guidozzi N, Wiggins T, Ahmed AR, Hanna GB, Markar SR. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for
                   gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus 2019;32:doz031.  DOI  PubMed
               20.      Louie BE, Farivar AS, Shultz D, Brennan C, Vallières E, Aye RW. Short-term outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation
                   versus Nissen fundoplication for medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98:498-504; discussion
                   504.  DOI  PubMed
               21.      Sheu EG, Nau P, Nath B, Kuo B, Rattner DW. A comparative trial of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation and Nissen
                   fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2015;29:505-9.  DOI  PubMed
               22.      Riegler M, Schoppman SF, Bonavina L, Ashton D, Horbach T, Kemen M. Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for
                   GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1123-9.  DOI
                   PubMed
               23.      Warren HF, Reynolds JL, Lipham JC, et al. Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen
                   fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2016;30:3289-96.  DOI  PubMed
               24.      O'Neill SM, Jalilvand AD, Colvin JS, Haisley KR, Perry KA. S148: Long-term patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic
                   sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication: a 5-year follow-up study. Surg Endosc 2022.  DOI  PubMed
               25.      Wu H, Attaar M, Wong HJ, et al. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) after magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX®) compared to
                   fundoplication. Surg Endosc 2022.  DOI  PubMed
               26.      Chen MY, Huang DY, Wu A, et al. Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal
                   reflux disease in short term: a meta-analysis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2017:9596342.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               27.      Zhuang QJ, Tan ND, Chen SF, Zhang MY, Xiao YL. Magnetic sphincter augmentation in treating refractory gastroesophageal reflux
                   disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2021;22:695-705.  DOI  PubMed
               28.      Sterbling HM, Fernando HC. Laparoscopic anti-reflux operation: fundoplication vs. Linx - techniques and outcomes. Shanghai Chest
                   2021;5:9-9.  DOI
                                                   ®
               29.      Skubleny D, Switzer NJ, Dang J, et al. LINX  magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for
                   gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3078-84.  DOI  PubMed
               30.      Tatum JM, Alicuben E, Bildzukewicz N, Samakar K, Houghton CC, Lipham JC. Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the
                   diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery. Surg Endosc 2019;33:782-8.  DOI  PubMed
               31.      Sterris JA, Dunn CP, Bildzukewicz NA, Lipham JC. Magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal
                   reflux disease: pros and cons. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2020;36:323-8.  DOI  PubMed
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41