Page 37 - Read Online
P. 37

Page 8 of 8           Triantafyllou et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:31  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.48

               27.      Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa TA. Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after
                   esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013;257:238-48.  DOI  PubMed
               28.      Halliday LJ, Doran SLF, Sgromo B, et al. Variation in esophageal anastomosis technique-the role of collaborative learning. Dis
                   Esophagus 2020;33:doz072.  DOI  PubMed
               29.      Okamura A, Watanabe M, Mine S, et al. Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
                   Surg Endosc 2016;30:4279-85.  DOI  PubMed
               30.      Deng XF, Liu QX, Zhou D, Min JX, Dai JG. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a
                   meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:4757-64.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               31.      Yang Y, Li B, Yi J, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous
                   cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE trial. Ann Surg 2022;275:646-53.  DOI  PubMed
               32.      Tagkalos E, van der Sluis PC, Berlth F, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus
                   minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial). BMC
                   Cancer 2021;21:1060.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               33.      Chao YK, Li ZG, Wen YW, et al. Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE):
                   study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019;20:346.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               34.      Ladak F, Dang JT, Switzer N, et al. Indocyanine green for the prevention of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a meta-
                   analysis. Surg Endosc 2019;33:384-94.  DOI  PubMed
               35.      Casas MA, Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Dreifuss NH, Schlottmann F. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for
                   prevention of anastomotic leak in totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis
                   Esophagus 2022;35:doab056.  DOI  PubMed
               36.      LeBlanc G, Takahashi C, Huston J, Shridhar R, Meredith K. The use of indocyanine green (ICYG) angiography intraoperatively to
                   evaluate gastric conduit perfusion during esophagectomy: does it impact surgical decision-making? Surg Endosc 2023.  DOI  PubMed
               37.      de Groot EM, Kuiper GM, van der Veen A, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
                   with intrathoracic anastomosis: a prospective study. Updates Surg 2023;75:409-18.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               38.      Low DE, Allum W, De Manzoni G, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
                        ®
                   (ERAS ) society recommendations. World J Surg 2019;43:299-330.  DOI  PubMed
               39.      Froghi F, Sanders G, Berrisford R, et al. A randomised trial of post-discharge enteral feeding following surgical resection of an upper
                   gastrointestinal malignancy. Clin Nutr 2017;36:1516-9.  DOI  PubMed
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42