Page 17 - Read Online

Kikuchi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:8 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.88 Page 11 of 11

11. Yang Y, Li B, Yi J, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous
cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE trial. Ann Surg 2022;275:646-53. DOI PubMed
12. Chao YK, Li ZG, Wen YW, et al. Robotic-assisted esophagectomy vs video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (REVATE): study
protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019;20:346. DOI PubMed PMC
13. Haneda R, Kikuchi H, Nagakura Y, et al. Development and validation of the optimal circumferential resection margin in pathological
T3 esophageal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 2022;29:4452-61. DOI PubMed
14. Okada N, Fujii S, Fujita T, et al. The prognostic significance of the positive circumferential resection margin in pathologic T3
squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery 2016;159:441-50. DOI PubMed
15. Evans R, Bundred JR, Kaur P, Hodson J, Griffiths EA. Meta-analysis of the influence of a positive circumferential resection margin in
oesophageal cancer. BJS Open 2019;3:595-605. DOI PubMed PMC
16. Kikuchi H, Takeuchi H. Future perspectives of surgery for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;24:219-22. DOI
PubMed PMC