Page 23 - Read Online
P. 23

Olivero et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:6  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.117  Page 9 of 10

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               The study has been designed and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. An informed
               consent to utilize the data for research purposes was obtained from all participants.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2022.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Sood A, Abdollah F, Menon M. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2019;123:7-8.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Patel VR, Abdul-Muhsin HM, Schatloff O, et al. Critical review of ‘pentafecta’ outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic
                   prostatectomy in high-volume centres. BJU Int 2011;108:1007-17.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Bianchi L, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, et al. Oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical
                   prostatectomy: results from a single institution series with more than 10 years follow up. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2019;71:38-46.  DOI
                   PubMed
               4.       Inoue S, Hieda K, Hayashi T, Teishima J, Matsubara A. Longitudinal analysis of trifecta outcome in Japanese patients with prostate
                   cancer following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2020.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function
                   (“trifecta”). Urology 2005;66:83-94.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Patel VR, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, et al. Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy:
                   early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon. BJU Int 2010;106:696-702.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical
                   prostatectomy. BJU Int 2011;107:100-4.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Borregales LD, Berg WT, Tal O, et al. ‘Trifecta’ after radical prostatectomy: is there a standard definition? BJU Int 2013;112:60-7.
                   DOI  PubMed
               9.       Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic
                   prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 2010;58:457-61.  DOI  PubMed
               10.      Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer—2020 update. Part
                   1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 2021;79:243-62.  DOI  PubMed
               11.      Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad MA, et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the Retzius-sparing approach
                   on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2017;72:677-85.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, et al. Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted
                   radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the Retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 2018;199:1210-7.
                   DOI  PubMed
               13.      Checcucci E, Veccia A, Fiori C, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic
                   review and analysis of comparative outcomes. BJU Int 2020;125:8-16.  DOI  PubMed
               14.      Olivero A, Galfano A, Piccinelli M, et al. Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy for surgeons in the learning curve: a
                   propensity score-matching analysis. Eur Urol Focus 2021;7:772-8.  DOI  PubMed
               15.      Galfano A, Secco S, Bocciardi AM, Mottrie A. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international
                   survey on surgical details and worldwide diffusion. Eur Urol Focus 2020;6:1021-3.  DOI  PubMed
               16.      Galfano A, Secco S, Panarello D, et al. Pain and discomfort after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparative
                   study between suprapubic cystostomy and urethral catheter as urinary drainage. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2019;71:381-5.  DOI  PubMed
               17.      Kowalczyk KJ, Davis M, O'Neill J, et al. Impact of Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy on penile
                   shortening, Peyronie's disease, and inguinal hernia sequelae. Eur Urol Open Sci 2020;22:17-22.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               18.      Davis M, Egan J, Marhamati S, Galfano A, Kowalczyk KJ. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted robotic prostatectomy: past, present, and
                   future. Urol Clin North Am 2021;48:11-23.  DOI  PubMed
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28