Page 19 - Read Online
P. 19

Olivero et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:6  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.117  Page 5 of 10

               Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of 1240 prostate cancer patients treated with the Retzius-sparing approach at a single European
               high-volume center
                Preoperative variables (n = 1240)
                Age, years, median (IQR)                                         65 (60-69.3)
                BMI, kg/mq, median (IQR)                                         26.1 (24.2-28.4)
                Charlson comorbidity index, n (%)
                0                                                                919 (74.1)
                1                                                                141 (11.4)
                2                                                                120 (9.7)
                3                                                                60 (4.8)
                Previous abdominal surgery, n (%)                                409 (33)
                Previous surgery for BPH, n (%)                                  57 (4.6)
                PSA at RS-RARP, ng/mL, median (IQR)                              6.9 (5-9.9)
                Clinical tumour stage, n (%)
                ≤ cT2a                                                           703 (56.5)
                cT2b                                                             305 (24.6)
                cT2c                                                             146 (11.8)
                ≥ cT3                                                            88 (7.1)
                ISUP grade group at prostate biopsy, n (%)
                1                                                                582 (46.4)
                2                                                                322 (25.8)
                3                                                                133 (10.5)
                4                                                                152 (12.2)
                5                                                                51 (4.1)
                EAU risk classification group, n (%)
                Low                                                              412 (33.2)
                Intermediate                                                     525 (42.4)
                High                                                             303 (24.4)
                Prostate volume, mL, median (IQR)                                42 (32-55)
                Intraoperative variables (n = 1240)
                Nerve sparing technique, n (%)
                Full NS                                                          891 (71.7)
                Partial NS                                                       49 (4.1)
                Non NS                                                           300 (24.2)

               BMI: Body mass index; BPH: benign prostate hyperplasia; PSA: prostate specific antigen; ISUP: International Society of Urological Pathology; RS-
               RARP: Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; IQR: inter-quartile range; NS: nerve sparing; ISUP: International Society of Urological
               Pathology; EAU: European Association of Urology.


               counseling of PCa patients and better inform them regarding what to expect after the surgery, we analyzed
               the trifecta outcome at 24 months after the surgery. We investigated the possible predictor factors in over
               1200 patients who had undergone rs-RARP in a high-volume center. We found that more than 40% of the
               patients 24 months after rs-RARP reached the trifecta outcome, regardless of the patients’ age or the NS-
               approach used during the surgery.

               Moreover, we found that age and NS technique are independent predictors of the trifecta outcome. Lastly,
               as previously demonstrated, we observed that the potency rate is the item that most influences the trifecta
               rate as only slightly more than 50% of our group was potent after rs-RARP.

               Our findings will help better assess the risk of not reaching the trifecta outcome after rs-RARP and give
               valuable information for the preoperatory counseling of PCa patients.
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24