Page 97 - Read Online
P. 97

Page 10 of 11       Avvedimento et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:24  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.143

               requiring coronary angiography and/or PCI as well as redo-TAVI is expected to increase. Therefore,
               preserving a manageable coronary re-access after TAVI is becoming a priority in the management of these
               patients. The ability to traverse a THV to access the coronary ostia is related to anatomic factors (coronary
               height, STJ height, and width) and valve-related features. Self-expanding platforms may present technical
               challenges due to their supra-annular position above the coronary ostia, closed-cell frame design, and
               asymmetrical skirt. Modified delivery system insertion techniques have been linked to better commissural
               alignment and less coronary overlap with self-expandable THVs, but further studies are needed to confirm
               and improve their reproducibility. Conversely, balloon-expandable valves, given their low frame height with
               sub-coronary implantation and large-cell frame design, generally ensure easier coronary ostium cannulation
               despite commissural misalignment. However, commissural alignment is helpful in all THV platforms for
               redo-TAVI, especially when the risk plane is above the coronary ostia and even STJ, risking sinus
               sequestration and coronary obstruction with redo-TAVI. An individualized decision-making approach is
               recommended in device selection and sizing when considering future coronary access and redo-TAVI.


               DECLARATIONS
               Author contributions
               Drafted and revised the manuscript: Avvedimento M
               Drafted and revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript: Tang GHL

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and Sponsorship
               None.

               Conflict of Interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2022.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease:
                   executive summary: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association joint committee on clinical practice
                   guidelines. Circulation 2021;143:e35-71.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management
                   of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2022;43:561-632.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Avvedimento M, Tang GHL. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): recent updates. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2021;69:73-83.
                   DOI  PubMed
               4.       Fuchs A, Kofoed KF, Yoon SH, et al. Commissural alignment of bioprosthetic aortic valve and native aortic valve following surgical
                   and transcatheter aortic valve replacement and its impact on valvular function and coronary filling. JACC Cardiovasc Interv
                   2018;11:1733-43.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Dumonteil N, Marcheix B, Lairez O, Laborde JC. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe, non-calcified aortic regurgitation
                   and narrow aortic root: description from a case report of a new approach to potentially avoid coronary artery obstruction. Catheter
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102