Page 84 - Read Online
P. 84

Annibali et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:12  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.101  Page 13 of 16

                   long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of
                   Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European
                   Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;38:3382-90.  DOI
               6.       Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, et al; VARC-3 Writing Committee. Valve academic research consortium 3: updated endpoint
                   definitions for aortic valve clinical research. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:2717-46.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, et al; Writing Committee Members. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the management of patients
                   with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint
                   Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:450-500.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. EuroIntervention
                   2022;17:e1126-96.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       Sá MPBO, Van den Eynde J, Simonato M, et al. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve
                   replacement: an updated meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:211-20.  DOI  PubMed
               10.      Thandra A, Abusnina W, Jhand A, et al. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement
                   for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: an updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
                   2021;97:1481-8.  DOI  PubMed
               11.      Saleem S, Ullah W, Syed MA, et al. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated
                   bioprosthetic aortic valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021;98:940-7.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Tarantini G, Dvir D, Tang GHL. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic valves. EuroIntervention
                   2021;17:709-19.  DOI  PubMed
               13.      Edelman JJ, Khan JM, Rogers T, et al. Valve-in-valve TAVR: state-of-the-art review. Innovations (Phila) 2019;14:299-310.  DOI
                   PubMed
               14.      Simonato M, Dvir D. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed surgical valves. Heart 2019;105:s38-43.  DOI  PubMed
               15.      Duncan A, Moat N, Simonato M, et al. Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative stentless versus
                   stented bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:1256-63.  DOI  PubMed
               16.      Ribeiro HB, Rodés-Cabau J, Blanke P, et al. Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following
                   transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: insights from the VIVID registry. Eur Heart J
                   2018;39:687-95.  DOI  PubMed
               17.      Alnasser S, Cheema AN, Simonato M, et al; Valve-in-Valve International Data Registry Investigators. Matched comparison of self-
                   expanding transcatheter heart valves for the treatment of failed aortic surgical bioprosthesis: insights from the valve-in-valve
                   international data registry (VIVID). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:e004392.  DOI  PubMed
               18.      Seiffert M, Treede H, Schofer J, et al. Matched comparison of next- and early-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve
                   implantations in failed surgical aortic bioprostheses. EuroIntervention 2018;14:e397-404.  DOI  PubMed
               19.      Francone M, Budde RPJ, Bremerich J, et al. CT and MR imaging prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: standardisation of
                   scanning protocols, measurements and reporting-a consensus document by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR).
                   Eur Radiol 2020;30:2627-50.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               20.      Bapat V. Valve-in-valve apps: why and how they were developed and how to use them. EuroIntervention 2014;10 Suppl U:U44-51.
                   DOI  PubMed
               21.      Jabbour RJ, Tanaka A, Finkelstein A, et al. Delayed coronary obstruction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll
                   Cardiol 2018;71:1513-24.  DOI  PubMed
               22.      Dvir D. Treatment of small surgical valves: clinical considerations for achieving optimal results in valve-in-valve procedures. JACC
                   Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:2034-6.  DOI  PubMed
               23.      Rodés-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Suri RM, et al. Impact of aortic annulus size on valve hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after
                   transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:701-11.  DOI
                   PubMed
               24.      Ochiai T, Oakley L, Sekhon N, et al. Risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration in redo transcatheter aortic valve
                   replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13:2617-27.  DOI  PubMed
               25.      Blanke P, Soon J, Dvir D, et al. Computed tomography assessment for transcatheter aortic valve in valve implantation: the vancouver
                   approach to predict anatomical risk for coronary obstruction and other considerations. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2016;10:491-9.
                   DOI  PubMed
               26.      Dvir D, Leipsic J, Blanke P, et al. Coronary obstruction in transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation: preprocedural evaluation,
                   device selection, protection, and treatment. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:e002079.  DOI  PubMed
               27.      Mercanti F, Rosseel L, Neylon A, et al. Chimney stenting for coronary occlusion during TAVR: insights from the chimney registry.
                   JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13:751-61.  DOI  PubMed
               28.      Romano V, Buzzatti N, Latib A, Colombo A, Montorfano M. Chimney technique for coronary obstruction after aortic valve in valve:
                   pros and cons. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:1194.  DOI  PubMed
               29.      Khan JM, Dvir D, Greenbaum AB, et al. Transcatheter laceration of aortic leaflets to prevent coronary obstruction during transcatheter
                   aortic valve replacement: concept to first-in-human. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:677-89.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               30.      Khan JM, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, et al. The BASILICA trial: prospective multicenter investigation of intentional leaflet
                   laceration to prevent TAVR coronary obstruction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:1240-52.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               31.      De Backer O, Søndergaard L. Is BASILICA the standard for preventing coronary obstruction in high-risk transcatheter aortic valve
                   replacement? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:949-51.  DOI  PubMed
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89