Page 62 - Read Online
P. 62

Page 10 of 19            Masiero et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:4  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.104

               generation devices, Sapien 3 THVs yielded smaller effective orifice area (EOA) and a higher residual
               gradient than Evolut R THVs, and multivariate regression analysis revealed that the use of the Evolut R was
                                                                                                     [65]
               significantly associated with a lower risk for PPM, especially in patients with small annuli < 23 mm . In
               addition, in the Ocean TAVI registry, Evolut R seems to be superior to Sapien 3 in hemodynamic
               performance for patients with a small annulus (< 23 mm) up to one year after TAVI (mean prosthesis
                                                                                       2
                                                                                          2
                                                                             2
               gradient 9.0 mmHg vs. 12.0 mmHg; P < 0.001 and index EOA 1.20 cm /m  vs. 1.08 cm /m , P < 0.001), with a
                                                                          2
               lower incidence of moderate PPM (6.9% vs. 28.4%; P = 0.015) in the extremely small annulus-matched
               cohort (< 21 mm). Nevertheless, severe prosthesis-patient mismatch and all-cause mortality at one year
               were similar between the two groups . The supra-annular designed self-expandable ACURATE neo valve
                                              [66]
               also resulted in lower transvalvular gradients compared with the SAPIEN 3 Valve (mean gradient 7 mmHg
               vs. 11 mmHg; P < 0.0001), as shown in the SCOPE I randomized trial and in another multicenter
               propensity-matched analysis reporting less PPM with Acurate Neo compared to SAPIEN 3 in patients with
               an aortic annulus area < 400 mm 2[67,68] .

               The particularly favorable hemodynamic performance granted by supra-annular devices could theoretically
               be an advantage not only in small anatomies but also in the case of paradoxical LFLG AS, when it is of
               utmost importance to implant a device with the best hemodynamic performance possible. Paradoxical
               LFLG AS is described in about 10% of TAVI patients in large real-world registries, and it is more frequently
               encountered in female patients. There is evidence supporting a similar mid-term prognosis after TAVI
               procedure in paradoxical LFLG patients than in high gradient AS patients, despite higher perioperative
               mortality; however, the impact of device selection in this condition is hypothesized and still has to be
               demonstrated .
                           [69]

               Regarding the risk of acute coronary occlusion after TAVI, this rare complication is described more
               frequently in women, in patients receiving a balloon-expandable valve, and in those with a previous surgical
               bioprosthesis; lower-lying coronary ostium and shallow sinus of Valsalva were associated anatomic
               factors . In cases where the risk of coronary occlusion is considered significant, the availability of
                     [70]
               repositionable/retrievable TAVI systems should be considered. However, all these potential advantages of
               supra-annular self-expandable devices must always be counterbalanced by the lower rate of selective
                                                          [71]
               coronary cannulation described with these THVs . Reasons for impaired coronary selective cannulation
               with supra-annular devices are the taller-frame design, higher leaflets’ position, and asymmetric skirt, which
               might hinder coronary access if a commissural post is placed in front of a coronary ostium. Even if this issue
               could be mitigated by commissural alignment technique during valve deployment, nevertheless, in patients
               with concomitant coronary artery disease, small sino-tubular junction, and in younger patients, when the
               need for future TAVI-in-TAVI is likely expected, a short frame balloon-expandable device (Sapien
               iterations or Myval) should be advised .
                                               [72]

               Small ilio-femoral vessels and risk of vascular complications
               Finally, frailty and small body surface area oriented the choice towards lower profile THVs family, more
               adapted to the small iliofemoral diameters. The CoreValve Evolut R and now also the new generation
               Evolut Pro+ can be implanted using the InLine™ (Medtronic) sheath with 14 Fr outer diameter equivalent
               (minimum vessel diameter requirements 5.0 mm for sizes 23, 26, and 29 mm, in the absence of
               circumferential calcification). In addition, the last generation low-profile delivery system FlexNav (Abbott),
               designed for Portico and Navitor valve (Abbott), provides the same low insertion profile (access down to
               5.0 mm vessels). Specifically, the FlexNav DS features a hydrophilic-coated, integrated sheath to minimize
               vessel trauma at the access site. This technological improvement allowed reducing the insertion force and
               increasing deliverability respect to Evolut Pro valve with Enveo Pro. The rate of access site-related major
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67