Page 27 - Read Online
P. 27

Page 8 of 10          De Nunzio et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:22  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.138

               Table 2. Postoperative complications rate based on renorrhaphy technique
                Authors              Renorrhaphy technique          Events    Total   Odds ratio
                Publication year                                                      [95%CI]
                       [38]
                Bahler et al.        Single layer                   1         15      0.36 [0.04-3.37]
                (2015)               Double layer                   5         30
                        [44]
                Williams et al.      Single layer                   2         26      1.25 [0.21-7.28]
                (2016)               Double layer                   4         64

               defect securely. Care should be taken to avoid excluding the calyx or including segmental arteries in the
               suturing process. In this chapter, we emphasized the substantial changes of suturing techniques on the
               kidney over the years in partial nephrectomy. The emphasis has been on emulating principles from open
               surgery, streamlining procedures, and safeguarding renal parenchyma. Running sutures, particularly those
               using barbed wires, have shown promise in reducing operating time and ischemia duration. Although no
               definitive evidence and recommendations are provided in this context, the surgeon’s experience is still of
               utmost importance.


               Future studies incorporating standardized reporting of resection and reconstruction techniques are essential
               to evaluate their influence on short-term and long-term functional outcomes. Techniques that shorten
               clamping time may benefit long-term renal function and should be explored further through additional
               research, although they may be harmful in non-high volume centers.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: De Nunzio C, Tema G, Ghezzo N, Cicione A
               Performed data acquisition and provided administrative, technical, and material support: De Nunzio C,
               Tema G, Ghezzo N, Cicione A

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Figure 1 and the graphic abstract are from a patient database, and the ethical review agency Azienda
               Ospedaliera Sant’Andrea has exempted ethical approval for this study due to the nature of the review.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2024.
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32