Page 18 - Read Online
P. 18

Pecoraro et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:25  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.134  Page 11 of 12

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2024.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: the 2022
                   update. Eur Urol 2022;82:399-410.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Bertolo R, Bove P, Sandri M, et al; AGILE Group (Italian Group for Advanced Laparoendoscopic Surgery). Randomized clinical trial
                   comparing on-clamp versus off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal masses (CLOCK II Laparoscopic Study): a
                   intention-to-treat analysis of perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol Open Sci 2022;46:75-81.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               3.       Bravi CA, Larcher A, Capitanio U, et al. Perioperative outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic partial nephrectomy: a prospective
                   multicenter observational study (The RECORd 2 Project). Eur Urol Focus 2021;7:390-6.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Wake N, Bjurlin MA, Rostami P, Chandarana H, Huang WC. Three-dimensional printing and augmented reality: enhanced precision
                   for robotic assisted partial nephrectomy. Urology 2018;116:227-8.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Checcucci E, et al; for ESUT Research Group. Current use of three-dimensional model technology in
                   urology: a road map for personalised surgical planning. Eur Urol Focus 2018;4:652-6.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D, et al. Three-dimensional augmented reality robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in case of
                   complex tumours (PADUA ≥ 10): a new intraoperative tool overcoming the ultrasound guidance. Eur Urol 2020;78:229-38.  DOI
                   PubMed
               7.       Bertolo R, Autorino R, Fiori C, et al. Expanding the indications of robotic partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal tumors:
                   urologists’ perception of the impact of hyperaccuracy three-dimensional reconstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
                   2019;29:233-9.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Checcucci E, Amparore D, Pecoraro A, et al. 3D mixed reality holograms for preoperative surgical planning of nephron-sparing
                   surgery: evaluation of surgeons’ perception. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021;73:367-75.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Checcucci E, et al. Three-dimensional virtual imaging of renal tumours: a new tool to improve the accuracy
                   of nephrometry scores. BJU Int 2019;124:945-54.  DOI  PubMed
               10.      Minervini A, Campi R, Lane BR, et al. Impact of resection technique on perioperative outcomes and surgical margins after partial
                   nephrectomy for localized renal masses: a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 2020;203:496-504.  DOI  PubMed
               11.      Pecoraro A, Amparore D, Checcucci E, et al. Three-dimensional virtual models assistance predicts higher rates of “successful”
                   minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: an institutional analysis across the available trifecta definitions. World J Urol 2023;41:1093-
                   100.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Amparore D, Checcucci E, Piazzolla P, et al. Indocyanine green drives computer vision based 3D augmented reality robot assisted
                   partial nephrectomy: the beginning of “automatic” overlapping era. Urology 2022;164:e312-6.  DOI  PubMed
               13.      Diana P, Buffi NM, Lughezzani G, et al. The role of intraoperative indocyanine green in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: results
                   from a large, multi-institutional series. Eur Urol 2020;78:743-9.  DOI  PubMed
               14.      Shirk JD, Thiel DD, Wallen EM, et al. Effect of 3-dimensional virtual reality models for surgical planning of robotic-assisted partial
                   nephrectomy on surgical outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1911598.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               15.      Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Checcucci E, et al. Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical
                   prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists’ and patients’ perception. World J Urol 2018;36:201-7.  DOI  PubMed
               16.      Checcucci E, Piazza P, Micali S, et al; Uro-technology, SoMe Working Group of the Young Academic Urologists of the European
                   Association of Urology. Three-dimensional model reconstruction: the need for standardization to drive tailored surgery. Eur Urol
                   2022;81:129-31.  DOI  PubMed
               17.      Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Bertolo R. Hyperaccuracy three-dimensional reconstruction is able to maximize the
                   efficacy of selective clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses. Eur Urol 2018;74:651-60.  DOI
                   PubMed
               18.      Checcucci E, Piramide F, De Cillis S, et al. Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) and User-
                                                                           TM
                   Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) for 3D intraoperative cognitive navigation (ICON3D ) system for urological procedures. Medicina
                   2023;59:624.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23