Page 36 - Read Online
P. 36

Page 8 of 9               Okano et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:29  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.15

               CONCLUSION
               ERCP-related procedures are important and indispensable techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of
               bilio-pancreatic diseases. There are many serious complications associated with ERCP-related procedures.
               Endoscopists must approach ERCP with an appropriate understanding of the complications and should be
               familiar with the prevention and countermeasures.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Ito K, Igarashi Y
               Performed data acquisition, as well as provided administrative, technical, and material support: Takuma K,
               Hara S, Igarashi Y


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies.
                   Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1781-8.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Pekgöz M. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review for prevention and treatment.
                   World J Gastroenterol 2019;25:4019-42.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               3.       Mazaki T, Mado K, Masuda H, Shiono M. Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-
                   analysis. J Gastroenterol 2014;49:343-55.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Mine T, Morizane T, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Clinical practice guideline for post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2017;52:1013-22.
                   DOI  PubMed
               5.       Zolotarevsky E, Fehmi SM, Anderson MA, et al. Prophylactic 5-Fr pancreatic duct stents are superior to 3-Fr stents: a randomized
                   controlled trial. Endoscopy 2011;43:325-30.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               6.       Afghani E, Akshintala VS, Khashab MA, et al. 5-Fr vs. 3-Fr pancreatic stents for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk
                   patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2014;46:573-80.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Rashdan A, Fogel EL, Mchenry L, Sherman S, Temkit M, Lehman GA. Improved stent characteristics for prophylaxis of post-ERCP
                   pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:322-9.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Smith MT, Sherman S, Ikenberry SO, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Alterations in pancreatic ductal morphology following polyethylene
                   pancreatic stent therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:268-75.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ, et al; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP
                   pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - updated June 2014. Endoscopy 2014;46:799-815.
                   DOI  PubMed
               10.      Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, et al. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the
                   selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 2008;40:302-7.  DOI  PubMed
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41