Page 18 - Read Online
P. 18
Addeo Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:64 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.47 Page 3 of 5
Survival NA 75% NA NA NA 50% NA NA NA
Reoperation 1 NA 2 (14.2%) 1 (12.5%) NA 1 NA 1 (2%) 0
Morbidity 1 11 (35.5%) NA NA NA 0 40% 14 (28%) 1
Mortality 0 1 (3.3%) 2 (14.2%) 1 (12.5%) NA 0 0 4 (8%) 0
Arterial resection 0 1 0 0 NA 0 0 0 0
Graft 12 [Patch (10), LRV (1), Synthetic (1)] pericardial patch)
1 (PTFE) NA 3 (1 Patch, 2 Prothesis) NA 4 2 6 (Bovine 0
Lateral/ segmental 2/0 22/9 NA 5/3 NA 4 NA 49/1 0/1
Table 1. Outcomes of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection
Venous resection 2 31 14 8 20 4 10 50 1 The initial search resulted in 58 studies. Only 9 studies (reported from US, n = 4; France, n = 1; Italy, n = 2; Russia, n = 1; China, n = 1) matched the inclusion criteria, however [5,12-19] [Table 1, Figure 1]. This included 140 patients undergoing PD with vascular resection. Sixty-six PDs were performed robotically (47.1%). There were 82 laterals (58.5%), 18 segmental (12.8%) and 29 not specified
Operative time (min) 392 465 NA NA 518 397 547 419 435
Blood loss (mL) 200 842 NA NA 250 437 435 275 150
Conversion 0 0 NA NA 11 0 3 5 0
Approach Robotic Laparoscopic Robotic Laparoscopic Laparoscopic Laparoscopic Laparoscopic Robotic Laparoscopic PTFE: polytetrafluoroethylene; LRV: left renal vein; NA: not available
Year 2011 2015 2016 2017 2017 2018 2018 2019 2020
Giulianotti et al. [16] Croome et al. [14] Khatkov et al. [18] Stauffer et al. [5] Dokmak et al. [15] Beane et al. [12] Rosso et al. [19] RESULTS patients (3.5%). DISCUSSION phenomenon.
Author Boggi et al. [11] Cai et al. [13]