Page 14 - Read Online

Kauffmann et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:54 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.46 Page 9 of 10

invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 2020;271:1-14.
2. Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GRB, Neal CP, Peterson M, et al. Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J
Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:1129-37.
3. Leonard AS, Giebink GS, Baesl TJ, Krivit W. The overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis problem. World J Surg 1980;4:423-32.
4. Malangoni MA, Dillon LD, Klamer TW, Condon RE. Factors influencing the risk of early and late serious infection in adults after
splenectomy for trauma. Surgery 1984;96:775-83.
5. Buzelé R, Barbier L, Sauvanet A, Fantin B. Medical complications following splenectomy. J Visc Surg 2016;153:277-86.
6. Rottenstreich A, Kleinstern G, Spectre G, Da’as N, Ziv E, et al. Thromboembolic events following splenectomy: risk factors, prevention,
management and outcomes. World J Surg 2018;42:675-81.
7. Kimura W, Yano M, Sugawara S, Okazaki S, Sato T, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery
and vein: techniques and its significance. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2010;17:813-23.
8. Kimura W, Inoue T, Futakawa N, Shinkai H, Han I, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with conservation of the splenic artery
and vein. Surgery 1996;120:885-90.
9. Warshaw AL. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 1988;123:550-3.
10. Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, et al. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot
Comput Assist Surg 2013;9:396-406.
11. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech
2004;18:790-5.
12. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in
epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:344-9.
13. Keats AS. The ASA classification of physical status - a recapitulation. Anesthesiology 1978;49:233-6.
14. Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, Iacopi S, Cacace C, et al. Robot-assisted radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy
including resection and reconstruction of the spleno-mesenteric junction. J Vis Exp 2020; doi: 10.3791/60370.
15. Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Perrone VG, Miccoli M, Brozzetti S, et al. The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy. Updates Surg
2015;67:257-64.
16. Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Menonna F, Cacace C, Genovese V, et al. Robot-assisted spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: case report.
Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2020.
17. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition
and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surg 2017;161:584-91.
18. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested
definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007;142:761-8.
19. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)-an international study group of
pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007;142:20-5.
20. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients
and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
21. Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure
surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 2013;258:1-7.
22. Del Chiaro M, Besselink MG, Scholten L, Bruno MJ, Cahen DL, et al. European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic
neoplasms. Gut 2018;67:789-804.
23. Capretti G, Boggi U, Salvia R, Belli G, Coppola R, et al. Application of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an Italian survey. Updates
Surg 2019;71:97-103.
24. Balzano G, Bissolati M, Boggi U, Bassi C, Zerbi A, et al. A multicenter survey on distal pancreatectomy in Italy: results of minimally
invasive technique and variability of perioperative pathways. Updates Surg 2014;66:253-63.
25. Klompmaker S, Van Zoggel D, Watkins AA, Eskander MF, Tseng JF, et al. Nationwide evaluation of patient selection for minimally
invasive distal pancreatectomy using American College of Surgeons’ National Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 2017;266:1055-61.
26. Ohtsuka T, Ban D, Nakamura Y, Nagakawa Y, Tanabe M, et al. Difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018;25:489-97.
27. Sharib JM, Fonseca AL, Swords DS, Jaradeh K, Bracci PM, et al. Surgical overtreatment of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous
neoplasms: do the 2017 international consensus guidelines improve clinical decision making? Surg (United States) 2018;164:1178-84.
28. Balzano G, Capretti G, Callea G, Cantù E, Carle F, et al. Overuse of surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. A nationwide analysis in
Italy. HPB 2016;18:470-8.
29. Pietrabissa A, Moretto C, Boggi U, Di Candio G, Mosca F. Laparoscopic distal pancreatomy: Are we ready for a standardized technique?
Semin Laparosc Surg 2004;11:179-83.
30. Hong S, Song KB, Madkhali AA, Hwang K, Yoo D, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic
tumors: a single surgeon’s experience of 228 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2020;34:2465-73.
31. Chen S, Zhan Q, Chen JZ, Jin JB, Deng XX, et al. Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital
stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3507-18.
32. Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, Dumas RP, Beane JD, et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 2010;148:814-23.
33. Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to
the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 2013;257:128-32.