Page 153 - Read Online
P. 153

Page 12 of 14                                      Khaitan et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:51  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.34
                                                                            [30]
               designed to compare RAMIE to MIE in a randomized controlled setting . The study includes four centers
               from China and will focus on patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The primary
               endpoint of the study is 5-year overall survival, with secondary endpoints of 3-year overall and disease-free
               survival, 5-year disease-free survival, short-term outcomes, and quality of life. The hypothesis of the trial is
               that RAMIE will result in equivalent oncologic outcomes and long-term quality of life, along with shorter
               operative times, lower perioperative complications, and shorter hospital stays, when compared to MIE.

               The REVATE trial, a two-center, open-label RCT of esophageal SCC, will compare lymph node dissection
                                                 [25]
               along the RLN during RAMIE vs. MIE . The two institutions participating in this RCT are from China
               and Taiwan, where SCC is more prominent than esophageal adenocarcinoma, favoring upper or middle
               esophageal tumors where dissection of lymph nodes around the RLNs is critical. The study, while
               meaningful for that patient population, will be difficult to apply to Western cohorts comprised primarily of
               patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction.

               CONCLUSION
               Robotic approaches to esophagectomy are being utilized with increased frequency and improve
               upon established techniques of MIE by offering superior dexterity, maneuverability, ergonomics, and
               visualization. Randomized and non-randomized studies have demonstrated equivalent oncologic
               outcomes between robotic and open esophagectomies, with superior results for the robotic approach in
               terms of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, and overall quality of life. As surgeons become trained in
               robotic techniques and implement them further into their treatment armamentarium, the use of RAMIE
               for appropriately selected cases of esophageal malignancy or other end-stage esophageal disease will
               undoubtedly, continue to increase. With the introduction of novel and competing robotic technologies, the
               hope is that their cost will decrease, allowing further penetration into the marketplace.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the manuscript, and performed data
               analysis and interpretation: Khaitan PG
               Contributed to manuscript writing and editing: Lazar JF, Henderson HR, Watson TJ
               Provided technical and material support: Margolis M


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158