Page 20 - Read Online

Page 14 of 15 Shannon et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:32 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.83

J Gastroenterol 2019;25:5711-31. DOI PubMed PMC
80. Chen K, Pan Y, Liu XL, et al. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of
literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 2017;17:120. DOI PubMed PMC
81. Pfister M, Probst P, Müller PC, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatic surgery: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
BJS Open 2023;7:zrad007. DOI PubMed PMC
82. Nickel F, Haney CM, Kowalewski KF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-
analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2020;271:54-66. DOI
83. Dembinski J, Yoh T, Aussilhou B, et al. The long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary
carcinoma showed similar survival: a case-matched comparative study. Surg Endosc 2022;36:4732-40. DOI
84. Vandeputte M, Vansteenkiste F, Ceelen W, De Meyere C, D’Hondt M. Morbidity and survival after laparoscopic versus open
pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score matched comparison. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023;408:16. DOI PubMed
85. Zhang B, Xu Z, Gu W, et al. Postoperative complications and short-term prognosis of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy vs.
open pancreaticoduodenectomy for treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg Oncol
2023;21:26. DOI PubMed PMC
86. Rosemurgy AS, Ross SB, Espeut A, et al. Survival and robotic approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score-match
study. J Am Coll Surg 2022;234:677-84. DOI
87. van Oosten AF, Ding D, Habib JR, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched analysis
to open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2021;25:1795-804. DOI
88. Liu Q, Zhao Z, Zhang X, et al. Perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in low-risk
surgical candidates: a multicenter propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg 2023;277:e864-71. DOI
89. Meyyappan T, Wilson GC, Zeh HJ, et al. Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after
pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Surg Endosc 2023;37:1181-7. DOI
90. Mulchandani J, Shetty N, Kulkarni A, Shetty S, Sadat MS, Kudari A. Short-term and pathologic outcomes of robotic versus open
pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic head malignancy: an early experience. J Robot Surg 2022;16:859-66. DOI
PubMed
91. Weng Y, Jiang Y, Fu N, et al. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2021;35:3437-48. DOI PubMed PMC
92. Zheng J, Pulvirenti A, Javed AA, et al. Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: multi-
institutional 10-year experience of 1,023 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2022;235:315-30. DOI
93. Cai J, Ramanathan R, Zenati MS, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with decreased clinically relevant pancreatic
fistulas: a propensity-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:1111-8. DOI
94. Vining CC, Kuchta K, Berger Y, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases the risk of clinically relevant post-operative
pancreatic fistula: a propensity score matched NSQIP analysis. HPB 2021;23:367-78. DOI
95. Jin J, Shi Y, Chen M, et al. Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumors (PORTAL): a
study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials 2021;22:954. DOI PubMed PMC
96. Zhang H, Feng Y, Zhao J, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (TJDBPS01):
study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open 2020;10:e033490. DOI PubMed PMC
97. Pan S, Qin T, Yin T, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: study protocol
for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2022;12:e057128. DOI PubMed PMC
98. Baker EH, Ross SW, Seshadri R, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison of complications and cost to the open
approach. Int J Med Robot 2016;12:554-60. DOI
99. Benzing C, Timmermann L, Winklmann T, et al. Robotic versus open pancreatic surgery: a propensity score-matched cost-
effectiveness analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022;407:1923-33. DOI PubMed PMC
100. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the
United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117-27. DOI PubMed
101. Chan KS, Wang ZK, Syn N, Goh BKP. Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review. Surgery
2021;170:194-206. DOI PubMed
102. Morató O, Poves I, Burdío F, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Duran X, Grande L. Evaluation of the learning curve for laparoscopic
pancreatoduodenectomy by CUSUM analyses. Cohort study. Int J Surg 2020;80:61-7. DOI PubMed
103. Kim H, Park SY, Park Y, et al. Assessment of learning curve and oncologic feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a
propensity score-based comparison with open approach. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022;29:649-58. DOI PubMed
104. Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Gao YX, Lau WY, Liu R. The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic
pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center. Surg Endosc 2019;33:2927-33. DOI
105. Ryoo DY, Eskander MF, Hamad A, et al. Mitigation of the robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy learning curve through comprehensive
training. HPB 2021;23:1550-6. DOI
106. Zwart MJW, Nota CLM, de Rooij T, et al. Outcomes of a multicenter training program in robotic pancreatoduodenectomy
(LAELAPS-3). Ann Surg 2022;276:e886-95. DOI
107. Vining CC, Hogg ME. How to train and evaluate minimally invasive pancreas surgery. J Surg Oncol 2020;122:41-8. DOI PubMed
108. Grendar J, Ouellet J, Sutherland F, Bathe O, Ball C, Dixon E. In search of the best reconstructive technique after