Page 19 - Read Online

Shannon et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:32 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.83 Page 13 of 15

2021;108:188-95. DOI
52. Chen JW, van Ramshorst TME, Lof S, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in patients with resectable
pancreatic cancer: an international, retrospective, cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023;30:3023-32. DOI
53. Zhang X, Chen W, Jiang J, et al. A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon’s robotic
experience in a high-volume center. Surg Endosc 2022;36:9186-93. DOI PubMed
54. Fernández-Cruz L. Distal pancreatic resection: technical differences between open and laparoscopic approaches. HPB 2006;8:49-56.
DOI PubMed PMC
55. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 2003;133:521-7. DOI PubMed
56. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the
body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:244-9. DOI PubMed
57. Cao F, Li J, Li A, Li F. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard procedure in the treatment of left-sided
pancreatic cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surg 2017;17:67. DOI PubMed PMC
58. Zhou Y, Shi B, Wu L, Si X. A systematic review of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body
and tail of the pancreas. HPB 2017;19:10-5. DOI
59. Huo Z, Zhai S, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with standard retrograde
pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis and experience of a single center. Med Sci Monit
2019;25:4590-601. DOI PubMed PMC
60. Dai M, Zhang H, Li Y, et al. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal
pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surg Today 2021;51:1126-34. DOI
61. Larkins K, Rowcroft A, Pandanaboyana S, Loveday BPT. A systematic scoping review of the initial experience with laparoscopic
radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic malignancy. Surg Endosc 2021;35:4930-44. DOI PubMed
62. Zhang H, Li Y, Liao Q, et al. Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy
(RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2021;35:3763-73. DOI
63. Wu EJ, Kabir T, Zhao JJ, Goh BKP. Minimally invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: a meta-
analysis. World J Surg 2022;46:235-45. DOI PubMed
64. Tang W, Zhang YF, Zhao YF, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for
pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022;103:106676. DOI
65. Takagi K, Umeda Y, Yoshida R, Yagi T, Fujiwara T. A systematic review of minimally invasive versus open radical antegrade
modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 2022;42:653-60. DOI PubMed
66. Huang J, Xiong C, Sheng Y, Zhou X, Lu CD, Cai X. Laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for
pancreatic cancer: a single-institution comparative study. Gland Surg 2021;10:1057-66. DOI PubMed PMC
67. Niu N, He Y, Mou Y, et al. Clinical outcome comparison of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy vs.
laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma surgical resection. Front Surg
2022;9:981591. DOI PubMed PMC
68. van Hilst J, de Graaf N, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG. The landmark series: minimally invasive pancreatic resection. Ann Surg
Oncol 2021;28:1447-56. DOI PubMed PMC
69. Probst P, Schuh F, Dörr-Harim C, et al. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative complications between
minimally invasive and open DIStal PAnCreaTectomy (DISPACT-2 trial). BMJ Open 2021;11:e047867. DOI PubMed PMC
70. Dai M, Zhang H, Yang Y, et al. The effect of minimally invasive or open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy on
pancreatic cancer: a multicenter randomized clinical trial protocol. Front Oncol 2022;12:965508. DOI PubMed PMC
71. Zhang G, Kang Y, Zhang H, Wang F, Liu R. Robotic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus standard
retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SRPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020;21:306. DOI PubMed PMC
72. Wang M, Li D, Chen R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a
multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:438-47. DOI
73. Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for
periampullary tumours. Br J Surg 2017;104:1443-50. DOI PubMed
74. Poves I, Burdío F, Morató O, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for
pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2018;268:731-9. DOI
75. van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Bosscha K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours
(LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:199-207.
DOI PubMed
76. Yan Y, Hua Y, Chang C, Zhu X, Sha Y, Wang B. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and
periampullary tumor: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative studies. Front Oncol
2022;12:1093395. DOI PubMed PMC
77. Mazzola M, Giani A, Crippa J, et al. Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matching
analysis of short-term outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021;47:674-80. DOI
78. Hilst J, de Graaf N, Festen S, Hilal MA, Besselink M. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or peri-
ampullary tumours. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:688-9. DOI PubMed
79. Zhang H, Lan X, Peng B, Li B. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis. World