Page 69 - Read Online
P. 69

Imai et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:2  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.67  Page 7 of 8

               Although most of our patients had a history of surgery, one (1/18, approximately 5%) did not have a history
               of abdominal surgery and was diagnosed with a small bowel tumor. However, our study may have
               overestimated the frequency of small bowel tumors as most of our patients had a history of surgery.
               Furthermore, one patient with Meckel’s diverticulum on capsule endoscopy had a history of catheter
               insertion for peritoneal dialysis. Interestingly, CT and capsule endoscopy revealed variable findings in our
               study, which may be attributable to the small sample size. We speculate that the cause of small intestinal
               obstruction is typically related to the small intestinal tract; thus, endoscopic visualization of the small
               intestinal lumen might be more important for determining the cause of obstruction than contrast-enhanced
               CT-based evaluation of the surrounding regions. Therefore, capsule endoscopy may be useful for patients
               with an unclear cause of obstruction on CT. Nevertheless, CT is the gold standard investigation for the
               diagnosis of small intestinal obstruction and provides useful information. Additionally, the resolution of CT
               has significantly improved over time. Randomized clinical trials are needed to compare the diagnostic
               performance between CT and capsule endoscopy for small intestinal obstruction.


               It is crucial to accurately determine small intestinal patency before performing capsule endoscopy. In the
               present study, X-ray could not detect small intestinal patency in all patients. Previous large-scale studies
               have demonstrated that approximately 30% of patients require CT to determine the small intestinal
               patency [10,11] , which is consistent with our results. Compared with X-ray, non-contrast CT can accurately
               distinguish between small and large intestines and can identify patency capsules in the colon. Therefore,
               non-contrast CT should be considered in cases where the patency capsule cannot be identified on X-ray.
               Patency capsules are associated with important adverse events. A previous study demonstrated that the
               outer wall of the patency capsule remains undissolved in patients with Crohn’s disease, which can lead to
                                      [12]
               small intestinal obstruction .

               The main strength of the present study was that it was a prospective observational study that evaluated the
               cause of small intestinal obstruction in patients with a high risk of obstruction recurrence. However, this
               study also had several limitations. First, the sample size was small; Second, we did not compare the
               diagnostic accuracy between capsule endoscopy and other investigations; Third, the follow-up duration was
               short. Finally, most patients had a history of surgery. Therefore, our findings have limited generalizability to
               the general patient population and those without a history of abdominal surgery.


               In conclusion, capsule endoscopy and subsequent balloon endoscopy, after confirming the intestinal
               patency, revealed the cause of obstruction in our small patient population. Capsule endoscopy may be
               useful for these patients after the obstruction has been relieved. However, further large-scale comparative
               trials are needed.

               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               We thank all patients and their families.

               Authors’ contributions
               Conceptualized the trial design: Niikura R, Yamada A
               Collected the data: Niikura R, Yamada A, Suzuki H, Nakada A, Mitsuno Y, Yamamoto S
               Analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript: Imai M, Niikura R
               Edited the manuscript: Imai M, Niikura R, Aoki T, Hayakawa Y, Kawai T, Fujishiro M
               All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74