Page 23 - Read Online
P. 23

Tsuboi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2024;8:26  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.94  Page 17 of 21

                    electric-field propagation. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:253-9.  DOI  PubMed
               63.       Yung DE, Robertson AR, Davie M, et al. Double-headed small-bowel capsule endoscopy: real-world experience from a multi-centre
                    British study. Dig Liver Dis 2021;53:461-6.  DOI  PubMed
               64.       Hartmann D, Eickhoff A, Damian U, Riemann JF. Diagnosis of small-bowel pathology using paired capsule endoscopy with two
                    different devices: a randomized study. Endoscopy 2007;39:1041-5.  DOI  PubMed
               65.       Cave DR, Fleischer DE, Leighton JA, et al. A multicenter randomized comparison of the endocapsule and the Pillcam SB.
                    Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:487-94.  DOI  PubMed
               66.       Kim HM, Kim YJ, Kim HJ, et al. A pilot study of sequential capsule endoscopy using MiroCam and PillCam SB devices with
                    different transmission technologies. Gut Liver 2010;4:192-200.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               67.       Choi EH, Mergener K, Semrad C, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized comparison of a novel signal transmission capsule
                    endoscope to an existing capsule endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2013;78:325-32.  DOI  PubMed
               68.       Pioche M, Gaudin JL, Filoche B, et al; French Society of Digestive Endoscopy. Prospective, randomized comparison of two small-
                    bowel capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1181-8.  DOI  PubMed
               69.       Pioche M, Vanbiervliet G, Jacob P, et al; French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED). Prospective randomized comparison
                    between axial- and lateral-viewing capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure digestive bleeding. Endoscopy 2014;46:479-
                    84.  DOI  PubMed
               70.       Zwinger LL, Siegmund B, Stroux A, et al. CapsoCam SV-1 versus PillCam SB 3 in the detection of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding:
                    results of a prospective randomized comparative multicenter study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019;53:e101-6.  DOI  PubMed
               71.       Branchi F, Ferretti F, Orlando S, et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with celiac disease, axial versus lateral/panoramic
                    view: results from a prospective randomized trial. Dig Endosc 2020;32:778-84.  DOI  PubMed
               72.       Hirata I, Tsuboi A, Matsubara Y, et al. Clinical usefulness and acceptability of small-bowel capsule endoscopy with panoramic
                    imaging compared with axial imaging in Japanese patients. DEN Open ;5:e389.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               73.       Blanco-Velasco G, Zamarripa-Mottú RA, Solórzano-Pineda OM, Mascarenhas-Saraiva M, Blancas-Valencia JM, Hernández-
                    Mondragón OV. Comparison in the diagnostic yield between “Pillcam SB3” capsule endoscopy and “OMOM smart capsule 2” in
                    small bowel bleeding: a randomized head-to-head study. Dig Dis 2021;39:211-6.  DOI  PubMed
               74.       Dolak W, Kulnigg-Dabsch S, Evstatiev R, Gasche C, Trauner M, Püspök A. A randomized head-to-head study of small-bowel
                    imaging comparing MiroCam and EndoCapsule. Endoscopy 2012;44:1012-20.  DOI  PubMed
               75.       Blanco-Velasco G, Hernández-Mondragón OV, Solórzano-Pineda OM, García-Contreras LF, Martínez-Camacho C, E Murcio-Pérez
                    E. Which model of small bowel capsule endoscopy has a better diagnostic yield? Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2022;85:509-17.  DOI
               76.       Kunihara S, Oka S, Tanaka S, et al. Third-generation capsule endoscopy outperforms second-generation based on the detectability of
                    esophageal varices. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016;2016:9671327.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               77.       Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared
                    with colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2009;41:1026-31.  DOI  PubMed
               78.       Kjølhede T, Ølholm AM, Kaalby L, Kidholm K, Qvist N, Baatrup G. Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy compared with
                    colonoscopy for polyp detection: systematic review and meta-analyses. Endoscopy 2021;53:713-21.  DOI  PubMed
               79.       Vuik FER, Nieuwenburg SAV, Moen S, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
                    Endoscopy 2021;53:815-24.  DOI  PubMed
               80.       Möllers T, Schwab M, Gildein L, et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: systematic
                    review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Endosc Int Open 2021;9:E562-71.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               81.       González-Suárez B, Pagés M, Araujo IK, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer
                    screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial-the VICOCA study. BMC Med 2020;18:255.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               82.       Cash BD, Fleisher MR, Fern S, et al. Multicentre, prospective, randomised study comparing the diagnostic yield of colon capsule
                    endoscopy versus CT colonography in a screening population (the TOPAZ study). Gut 2021;70:2115-22.  DOI  PubMed
               83.       Sung J, Ho KY, Chiu HM, Ching J, Travis S, Peled R. The use of Pillcam colon in assessing mucosal inflammation in ulcerative
                    colitis: a multicenter study. Endoscopy 2012;44:754-8.  DOI  PubMed
               84.       Meister T, Heinzow HS, Domagk D, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy versus standard colonoscopy in assessing disease activity of
                    ulcerative colitis: a prospective trial. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17:641-6.  DOI  PubMed
               85.       Ye CA, Gao YJ, Ge ZZ, et al. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of severity and
                    extent of ulcerative colitis. J Dig Dis 2013;14:117-24.  DOI  PubMed
               86.       Hosoe N, Matsuoka K, Naganuma M, et al. Applicability of second-generation colon capsule endoscope to ulcerative colitis: a
                    clinical feasibility study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;28:1174-9.  DOI  PubMed
               87.       Oliva S, Di Nardo G, Hassan C, et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy vs. colonoscopy in pediatric ulcerative colitis: a
                    pilot study. Endoscopy 2014;46:485-92.  DOI  PubMed
               88.       Okabayashi S, Kobayashi T, Nakano M, et al. A simple 1-day colon capsule endoscopy procedure demonstrated to be a highly
                    acceptable monitoring tool for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2018;24:2404-12.  DOI  PubMed
               89.       Usui S, Hosoe N, Matsuoka K, et al. Modified bowel preparation regimen for use in second-generation colon capsule endoscopy in
                    patients with ulcerative colitis. Dig Endosc 2014;26:665-72.  DOI  PubMed
               90.       San Juan-Acosta M, Caunedo-Álvarez A, Argüelles-Arias F, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy is a safe and useful tool to assess disease
                    parameters in patients with ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;26:894-901.  DOI  PubMed
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28