Page 93 - Read Online
P. 93

Cendrós et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2020;4:210-20  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2020.21                                Page 213

                                          Table 1. General information about the study sample
                             Age                                Mean (years)       SD (%)
                                                                  43.9             13.8%
                             Gender                                                Percent
                               Men                                175              55%
                               Women                              143              45%
                             Diagnosis                                             Percent
                               Schizophrenia                      243              76.4%
                               Major depression                   3                0.9%
                               Brief psychosis                    1                0.4%
                               Delusional disorder                55               17.3%
                               Schizoaffective disorder           16               5%
                             Treatment                                             Percent
                               Clozapine                          141              44.3%
                               Olanzapine                         43               13.5%
                               Paliperidone                       41               12.9%
                               Risperidone                        40               12.6%
                               Aripiprazole                       22               6.9%
                               Quetiapine                         19               5.9%
                               Ziprasidone                        3                0.9%
                               Haloperidol                        2                0.6%
                               Asenapine                          2                0.6%
                               Levomepromazine                    2                0.6%
                               Trifluoperazine                    2                0.6%
                               Perfenazine                        1                0.3%
                               Pimozide                           1                0.3%
                             Altered PGX                                           Percent
                               Yes                                243              76.4%
                               No                                 75               23.6%
                            SD: standard deviation; Altered PGX: patients with a non-NM metabolism for the prescribed drug


               The dose used for each patient was recorded and standardized into olanzapine-equivalent doses between
                                           [26]
               the different antipsychotic agents ).

               Clinical parameters
               Clinical progression of patients was evaluated with the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) .
                                                                                                       [27]
               Patients were evaluated at the beginning of the study and 12 weeks after treatment. Similarly, the
               development of adverse events was tracked with the UKU side effects rating scale  at baseline and again
                                                                                     [28]
               at 12 weeks after starting treatment. The UKU scores for different side effects were grouped into four
               categories: psychic, neurologic, autonomic and others. A fifth and final category, total UKU, captures the
               overall emergence of any side effect, as it combines the scores of all UKU categories.

               Genetic profile
               Whole blood samples were taken from patients at the beginning of the study. DNA was extracted with
               a commercial kit (QIAmp DNA mini Kit, Qiagen) following the manufacturers recommendations.
               Genotyping of twenty functional polymorphisms in the ABCB1, CYP2C19, CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 genes,
               including copy number variations on the CYP2D6 gene, was performed using iPlex® Gold chemistry and
               the MassARRAY platform (CEGEN-PRB2-ISCIII, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain). Table 2
               summarizes the polymorphisms investigated and their predicted phenotype. The selected polymorphisms
               in cytochromes led to altered enzymatic activity, ranging from gene duplication related to increased protein
               production to loss of functionial alleles. The polymorphism in ABCB1 (3435C>T) leads to a synonymous
               substitution, however this change has been associated with lower expression, possibly due to linkage with a
               different causal polymorphism or by ribosome stalling, i.e., a less efficient translation by using a less usual
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98