Page 9 - Read Online
P. 9

Zhang et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2024;8:302-11  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2024.39  Page 306

               Table 2. Potential effects of enzymatic and supportive therapy on podocytes
                Treatments         Effects on podocytes
                Enzyme replacement therapy A reduction in Gb3 levels within podocytes
                Chaperone therapy  Reduced Gb3 deposits on podocytes
                SNCA inhibitor     Improve lysosome podocyte structure and function
                ACEI/ARB           Decrease progressive kidney disease by alleviating podocyte injury
                SGLT2 inhibitors   Alleviate podocyte damage by targeting the pathogenetic mechanisms, such as oxidative stress and inflammation



               Data from the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS) indicated that early initiation of ERT with agalsidase α can slow
               renal function deterioration and improve symptoms, and it also underscored the sustained efficacy and
               safety of ERT in FD patients . Sustained administration of agalsidase  β has been demonstrated to
                                         [27]
               effectively clear Gb3 from mesangial and glomerular endothelial cells . A dose-dependent clearance of Gb3
                                                                         [28]
               in podocytes was also reported . Research by Nowak et al. indicated that the licensed dosage of Agalsidase
                                         [28]
                                                                                               [29]
               β outperforms Agalsidase α in lowering Lyso-Gb3 levels among patients with classic FD . However,
               Arends et al. confirmed the higher prevalence of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in patients
               treated with agalsidase β . Long-term ERT can result in the production of ADAs, which diminishes the
                                    [30]
               therapeutic effectiveness of ERT by altering the catalytic function of the enzyme and cellular uptake to
               hasten the deterioration of renal function. Therefore, no conclusive evidence to show that one enzyme is
               superior to another during nearly two decades of ERT treatment. The choice between β and α enzymes often
               depends on individual responses and specific clinical contexts


               Chaperone therapy
               Migalastat, a pharmaceutical chaperone, has gained approval as the first oral medication for FD since 2016.
               It is specifically indicated for patients with amenable mutations, predominantly those with attenuated, late-
               onset forms of the disease who retain significant residual enzyme activity. Individuals with these genetic
               variants rarely have severe renal disease, resulting in minimal or absent podocyte impairment . Migalastat
                                                                                              [31]
               is a derivative of 1-deoxygalactonojirimycin and acts as a structural stabilizer for the terminal galactose of
               Gb3, enhancing susceptible mutant forms of the α-Gal A enzyme. Additionally, this compound increases
               and stabilizes the lysosomal activity , promoting the transport of susceptible mutant α-Gal A from the
                                              [32]
               endoplasmic reticulum to lysosomes. The enhancement of kidney and heart function, coupled with
               increased α-Gal A enzyme activity and reduced Gb3 deposits after chaperone therapy, indicated that
               migalastat could be a practical therapeutic choice and a secure substitute for ERT among FD patients .
                                                                                                       [33]
               Moreover, the capability of migalastat to penetrate the blood-brain barrier is promising, and its efficacy on
               neurological symptoms remains to be confirmed in upcoming studies.


               Developing treatments
               Substrate reduction therapies function by decreasing the synthesis of accumulated substrate caused by the
               lack of α-Gal A activity. A principal benefit of these treatments is their effectiveness regardless of the specific
               genetic mutation causing the enzymatic deficiency. Notably, they can be used as a standalone treatment or
               in conjunction with ERT .
                                    [34]

               Pegunigalsidase alfa represents a pegylated variant of the α-Gal A, produced through plant cell culture
               techniques, and is recently approved in the European Union and United States for the treatment of FD. In
               terms of efficacy outcomes, kidney biopsies from patients administered pegunigalsidase alfa showed a
               marked decrease in Gb3 levels, and their renal function was stable . Multiple phase-3 clinical trials are
                                                                         [35]
               either actively in progress, such as the BALANCE study [NCT02795676], or have recently concluded,
               including the BRIGHT study [NCT03180840] and the BRIDGE study [NCT03018730].
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14