Page 46 - Read Online
P. 46

Page 136                  Bibi et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2024;8:119-161  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2023.50

                                                                                         [10]
               elements in the tumor environment, making them unresponsive to these inhibitors . Recent research,
               however,  has  indicated  positive  outcomes  with  immune  checkpoint  inhibitors  (ICIs)  and  their
               combinations in specific patient groups with high PD-L1 expression, mutations in CDK12, elevated
               mutational pressure in tumors, and tumors displaying more mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and
               microsatellite instability (MSI) levels [11,247] . Immune checkpoint inhibitors are thus restricted to certain
               prostate cancer subtypes that have particular genetic or molecular characteristics that render them more
               recognizable or susceptible to the immune system [Figure 4]. Among these subtypes are:


               1. Increased microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or mutational changes in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes
               in prostate cancer: Uncommon prostate cancer subtypes with an increment in mutation rate and the ability
               to create aberrant proteins that the immune system may mistake for foreign substances. In some patients
               with  MSI-H  or  MMR-deficient  prostate  cancer,  ICI  drugs  that  target  PD-1  or  PD-L1,  such  as
               pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have been proven to be effective [246,248,249] .

               2. Prostate tumors with high PD-L1 expression: Some cancer cells express a protein that can attach to the
               immune cells of PD-1 receptor and stop those cells from attacking the cancer cells. By blocking this
               interaction, ICIs that target PD-1 and PD-L1 can activate the body's defenses against cancer cells. According
               to certain research, prostate tumors with more PD-L1 display may respond to ICIs more favorably than
               those with low PD-L13 expression [246,248] .

               3. High tumor mutational burden (TMB) prostate tumors: This is a measurement of the quantity of DNA
               mutations present in cancer cells. More aberrant proteins that the immune system may identify as foreign
               can result from a high TMB. Prostate tumors with high TMB may respond better to ICIs that target the
               PD-1 or PD-L1 proteins, compared to prostate cancers with low TMB [246,248,250] .


               4. Prostate tumors with CDK12 mutations: Transcription and DNA repair are the major role played by this
               gene. Genomic instability and a rise in the development of neoantigens—new or altered peptides identified
               as outsider by the immune system - can result from mutations in CDK12. Prostate tumors with CDK12
               mutations may respond better to immune system checkpoint medications focused on PD-1 or PD-L1 than
               those without [246,248] .

               Overview of clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors in prostate cancer
               Sipuleucel-T, an active cellular immunotherapy, demonstrated the clinical significance of the immune
               system in advanced prostate cancer (PCa). In a phase III trial, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic
               metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) patients receiving sipuleucel-T had a 22% lower risk of death
               compared to the placebo group (HR 0.78, 95%CI: 0.61-0.98), leading to a 4.1-month improvement in
               median overall survival. This underscores the potential of immune system modulation to benefit and
                                         [110]
               improve outcomes in mCRPC . In patients (CA184-095) with mildly symptomatic mCRPC who had not
               received chemotherapy, high-dose ipilimumab (10 mg/kg) monotherapy did not result in a better median
               OS compared to the placebo (28.7 months vs. 29.7 months; HR = 1.11, 95%CI: 26.1-34.2 months,
               P = 0.3667). However, compared to placebo, there were greater times to systemic nonhormonal cytotoxic
               therapy, a longer time to progression-free survival (5.6 months vs. 3.8 months; HR = 0.67, 95.87%CI: 0.55-
               0.81), and a larger PSA response rate (23% vs. 8%). All of these data suggested antitumor activity. In
               comparison to the 3 mg/kg dose used in melanoma, more treatment-related grade 3 to 4 adverse events
               (TRAEs) were reported (40% vs. 23%), and there were 9 treatment-related deaths [246,251]  (Table 1 Completed
               Immune checkpoint inhibitors Phase 3 clinical trials in prostate cancer [251-258] ).
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51