Page 80 - Read Online
P. 80

Page 2 of 12                                             Lorenzin et al. J Transl Genet Genom 2019;3:5. I  https://doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2019.01

               and genetically heterogeneous disease. Although the 5-year relative survival rate of patients diagnosed with
               localized disease is higher than 99%, a minority of patients progress to an aggressive form with metastasis
                                        [1]
               spreading and high mortality .
               At disease initiation, PCa relies on the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway for growth. Hence, the
               mainstay of therapy for PCa is represented by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as initially described
                                                                       [2,3]
               by landmark work of Charles Huggins and colleagues in 1941 . At recurrence upon prostatectomy
               or radiotherapy, ADT usually involves ablation of androgen synthesis through chemical castration by
               administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists and the use of competitive
               androgen receptor antagonists to further impede AR signaling. Despite this first-line therapy, most PCas
               adapt to androgen deprivation and restore AR signaling in the setting of low androgen production, a
               state referred to as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The development of next-generation AR
                                                                [4-7]
               pathway inhibitors, such as abiraterone and enzalutamide , allowed for survival benefits to patients with
               CRPC thanks to their ability to inhibit de novo androgen synthesis or to bind to and inactivate AR itself,
               respectively. However, drug resistance ultimately emerges.


               GENOMICS OF ADVANCED AND LOCALIZED DISEASE
               The genomics of PCa has been more challenging to study with respect to other solid tumor types due
               to multiple reasons, including intra-patient tumor heterogeneity and prevalence of structural genomic
                      [8]
               changes . In the past ten years, technological advances in next generation sequencing finally facilitated the
               deep genomic and epigenomic characterization of hormone naïve and castration resistant disease. This led
               to a more refined definition of molecular subclasses that could ultimately be used by clinicians to adjust the
               therapeutic strategies when resistance emerges. Over the last decade, a plethora of studies based on tumor
               tissue analyses (from prostatectomies, tissue biopsies or rapid autopsy program samples) has been published.
               More recently, the development of genomic and molecular profiling of prospectively collected liquid biopsy
               samples from individual patients has improved the critical evaluation of ongoing therapies thanks to the
               timely detection of mutations that arise in the resistant tumors.

               Primary prostate cancers are usually characterized by a diploid genome, low mutational burden, genomic
               rearrangements mainly involving the ETS genes and copy number aberrations, including deletions and
               amplifications. The overall genomic burden is associated with tumor grade [9-12]  and with biochemical
               recurrence [13,14] . Large and complex chromosomal rearrangements - such as chromoplexy and chromothripsis
               - are also prominent features of the prostate cancer genome [15-17] . CRPCs are highly aneuploidic, with
               approximately 40% of tumors being triploid and with a higher mutational load [18-21] . The comparison of the
               genomic status of primary prostate tumors and CRPCs identified lesions in TP53, AR, RB1, APC and BRCA2,
               among others, as enriched in the latter. These studies have shed light on the genomics driving prostate
               cancer resistance, which includes genomic rearrangements, point mutations and epigenetic changes [18,22-24] .
               This review will focus on the main mechanisms driving resistance to ADT therapy in advanced tumors that
               is mainly achieved either by restoration of the AR signaling or by enhanced lineage plasticity and activation
                                                                                         [25]
               of alternative pathways, thereby sustaining tumor growth independently from AR . The review will
               emphasize relevant aspects related to genomic features and functional studies reported for each mechanism
               of resistance [Figure 1].


               GENOMIC FEATURES OF AR-DEPENDENT RESISTANCE
               AR is a nuclear hormone receptor that upon activation by androgens [testosterone and 5-alpha-
               dihydrotestosterone (DHT)] translocates into the nucleus and binds to specific regulatory regions [AR
               responsive elements (ARE); in promoters and enhancers], regulating specific target genes and promoting
               prostate cell proliferation and survival.
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85