Page 40 - Read Online
P. 40

Liu et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 27  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2024.105  Page 17 of 18


                  144, 20601-9. DOI
               34. Zhou, L.; Fu, X. P.; Wang, R.; et al. Dynamic phase transitions dictate the size effect and activity of supported gold catalysts. Sci. Adv.
                  2024, 10, eadr4145. DOI
               35. Hou, P.; Yu, Q.; Luo, F.; Liu, J. C. Reactant-induced dynamic active sites on Cu catalysts during the water - gas shift reaction. ACS Catal.
                  2025, 15, 352-60. DOI
               36. Wu, J.; Chen, D.; Chen, J.; Wang, H. Structural and composition evolution of palladium catalyst for CO oxidation under steady-state
                  reaction conditions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 6262-70. DOI
               37. Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, W.; et al. DP-GEN: a concurrent learning platform for the generation of reliable deep learning based potential
                  energy models. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2020, 253, 107206. DOI
               38. Cheng, X.; Wu, C.; Xu, J.; Han, Y.; Xie, W.; Hu, P. Leveraging machine learning potentials for in-situ searching of active sites in
                  heterogeneous catalysis. Precis. Chem. 2024, 2, 570-86. DOI
               39. Chanussot, L.; Das, A.; Goyal, S.; et al. Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) dataset and community challenges. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 6059-72.
                  DOI
               40. Tran, R.; Lan, J.; Shuaibi, M.; et al. The Open Catalyst 2022 (OC22) dataset and challenges for oxide electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2023,
                  13, 3066-84. DOI
               41. Deng, B.; Zhong, P.; Jun, K.; et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling.
                  Nat. Mach. Intell. 2023, 5, 1031-41. DOI
               42. Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. DPA-2: a large atomic model as a multi-task learner. npj Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 293. DOI
               43. DeepModeling Community. https://deepmodeling.com. (accessed on 2025-03-17)
               44. Chen, M.; Guo, G. C.; He, L. Systematically improvable optimized atomic basis sets for ab initio calculations. J. Phys. Condens. Mat.
                  2010, 22, 445501. DOI
               45. Li, P.; Liu, X.; Chen, M.; et al. Large-scale ab initio simulations based on systematically improvable atomic basis. Comput. Mater. Sci.
                  2016, 112, 503-17. DOI
               46. Schlipf, M.; Gygi, F. Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2015, 196, 36-44.
                  DOI
               47. SG15 ONCV Potentials. http://quantum-simulation.org/potentials/sg15_oncv. (accessed on 2025-03-17)
               48. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. DOI
               49. Lin, P.; Ren, X.; He, L. Strategy for constructing compact numerical atomic orbital basis sets by incorporating the gradients of reference
                  wavefunctions. Phys. Rev. B. 2021, 103, 235131. DOI
               50. Monkhorst, H. J.; Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B. 1976, 13, 5188. DOI
               51. Methfessel, M.; Paxton, A. T. High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1989, 40, 3616. DOI
               52. Zhang, D.; Bi, H.; Dai, F. Z.; et al. Pretraining of attention-based deep learning potential model for molecular simulation. npj Comput.
                  Mater. 2024, 10, 94. DOI
               53. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; et al. Attention is all you need. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1706.03762. Available online: https://arxiv.org/
                  abs/1706.03762. (accessed on 17 Mar 2025)
               54. Henkelman, G.; Uberuaga, B. P.; Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum
                  energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 9901-4. DOI
               55. Henkelman, G.; Jónsson, H. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle
                  points. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 9978-85. DOI
               56. Henkelman, G.; Jónsson, H. A dimer method for finding saddle points on high dimensional potential surfaces using only first derivatives.
                  J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 7010-22. DOI
               57. Kästner, J.; Sherwood, P. Superlinearly converging dimer method for transition state search. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 014106. DOI
               58. Larsen, A. H.; Mortensen, J. J.; Blomqvist, J.; et al. The atomic simulation environment - a Python library for working with atoms. J.
                  Phys. Condens. Mat. 2017, 29, 273002. DOI
               59. Hermes, E. D.; Sargsyan, K.; Najm, H. N.; Zádor, J. Accelerated saddle point refinement through full exploitation of partial hessian
                  diagonalization. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019, 15, 6536-49. DOI
               60. Hermes, E. D.; Sargsyan, K.; Najm, H. N.; Zádor J. Sella, an open-source automation-friendly molecular saddle point optimizer. J. Chem.
                  Theory Comput. 2022, 18, 6974-88. DOI
               61. ATST-Tools. https://github.com/QuantumMisaka/ATST-Tools. (accessed on 2025-03-17)
               62. Vilhelmsen, L. B.; Hammer, B. A genetic algorithm for first principles global structure optimization of supported nano structures. J. Chem.
                  Phys. 2014, 141, 044711. DOI
               63. Zakaryan, H. A.; Kvashnin, A. G.; Oganov, A. R. Stable reconstruction of the (110) Surface and its role in pseudocapacitance of rutile-like
                  RuO 2. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10357. DOI
               64. Hinuma, Y.; Kamachi, T.; Hamamoto, N.; Takao, M.; Toyao, T.; Shimizu, K. Surface oxygen vacancy formation energy calculations in
                  34 orientations of   -Ga 2O 3 and   -Al 2O 3. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2020, 124, 10509-22. DOI
               65. Momma, K.; Izumi, F. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Cryst. 2011, 44,
                  1272-6. DOI
               66. Reuter, K.; Scheffler, M. Composition, structure, and stability of RuO 2(110) as a function of oxygen pressure. Phys. Rev. B. 2001, 65,
                  035406. DOI
               67. Reuter, K.; Scheffler, M. Composition and structure of the RuO 2(110) surface in an O 2 and CO environment: implications for the catalytic
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45