Page 100 - Read Online

Page 22 of 23 Li et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 43 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2025.17

30 Jun 2025)
65. Yan, B. Spin-orbit coupling: a relativistic effect. 2016. https://tms16.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/SOC_lecture1.pdf. (accessed 30 Jun
2025).
66. Inorganic Chemistry II review: 6.1 solid state structures. https://library.fiveable.me/inorganic-chemistry-ii/unit-6/solid-state-
structures/study-guide/qnl67GdXxyZ74VJP. (accessed 30 Jun 2025).
67. Gong, X.; Li, H.; Zou, N.; Xu, R.; Duan, W.; Xu, Y. General framework for E(3)-equivariant neural network representation of density
functional theory Hamiltonian. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2848. DOI PubMed PMC
68. Schütt, K. T.; Gastegger, M.; Tkatchenko, A.; Müller, K. R.; Maurer, R. J. Unifying machine learning and quantum chemistry with a
deep neural network for molecular wavefunctions. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5024. DOI PubMed PMC
69. Unke, O. T.; Bogojeski, M.; Gastegger, M.; Geiger, M.; Smidt, T.; Muller, K. R. SE(3)-equivariant prediction of molecular
wavefunctions and electronic densities. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS 2021). 2021. https://
proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/78f1893678afbeaa90b1fa01b9cfb860-Abstract.html. (accessed 30 Jun 2025).
70. Thomas, N.; Smidt, T.; Kearnes, S.; et al. Tensor field networks: rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3D point
clouds. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1802.08219. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.08219. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
71. Passaro, S.; Zitnick, C. L. Reducing SO(3) convolutions to SO(2) for efficient equivariant GNNs. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.03655.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03655. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
72. Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Tang, Z.; et al. DeepH-2: enhancing deep-learning electronic structure via an equivariant local-coordinate
transformer. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2401.17015. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.17015. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
73. Zhouyin, Z.; Gan, Z.; Liu, M.; Pandey, S. K.; Zhang, L.; Gu, Q. Learning local equivariant representations for quantum operators.
arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.06053. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.06053. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
74. Li, Y.; Xia, Z.; Huang, L.; et al. Enhancing the scalability and applicability of Kohn-Sham Hamiltonians for molecular systems. arXiv
2025, arXiv:2502.19227. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.19227. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
75. Yin, S.; Pan, X.; Wang, F.; He, L. TraceGrad: a framework learning expressive SO(3)-equivariant non-linear representations for
electronic-structure Hamiltonian prediction. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2405.05722. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.05722. (accessed 30
Jun 2025)
76. Yu, H.; Xu, Z.; Qian, X.; Qian, X.; Ji, S. Efficient and equivariant graph networks for predicting quantum Hamiltonian. arXiv 2023,
arXiv:2306.04922. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.04922. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
77. Zhong, Y.; Yu, H.; Su, M.; Gong, X.; Xiang, H. Transferable equivariant graph neural networks for the Hamiltonians of molecules
and solids. npj. Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 1130. DOI
78. Tang, Z.; Li, H.; Lin, P.; et al. A deep equivariant neural network approach for efficient hybrid density functional calculations. Nat.
Commun. 2024, 15, 8815. DOI PubMed PMC
79. Li, H.; Tang, Z.; Fu, J.; et al. Deep-learning density functional perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 096401. DOI
80. Yin, S.; Pan, X.; Zhu, X.; et al. Towards harmonization of SO(3)-equivariance and expressiveness: a hybrid deep learning framework
for electronic-structure Hamiltonian prediction. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2024, 5, 045038. DOI
81. Li, H.; Tang, Z.; Gong, X.; Zou, N.; Duan, W.; Xu, Y. Deep-learning electronic-structure calculation of magnetic superstructures.
Nat. Comput. Sci. 2023, 3, 321-7. DOI PubMed PMC
82. Gong, X.; Louie, S. G.; Duan, W.; Xu, Y. Generalizing deep learning electronic structure calculation to the plane-wave basis. Nat.
Comput. Sci. 2024, 4, 752-60. DOI PubMed PMC
83. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Tang, Z.; et al. Universal materials model of deep-learning density functional theory Hamiltonian. Sci. Bull. 2024,
69, 2514-21. DOI
84. Tang, H.; Xiao, B.; He, W.; et al. Approaching coupled-cluster accuracy for molecular electronic structures with multi-task learning.
Nat. Comput. Sci. 2025, 5, 144-54. DOI
85. Zhong, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, B.; et al. Accelerating the calculation of electron-phonon coupling strength with machine learning. Nat.
Comput. Sci. 2024, 4, 615-25. DOI
86. Ma, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, S.; Gong, X.; Xiang, H. Transferable machine learning approach for predicting electronic structures
of charged defects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025, 126, 044103. DOI
87. Gu, Q.; Zhouyin, Z.; Pandey, S. K.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, L.; E, W. Deep learning tight-binding approach for large-scale electronic
simulations at finite temperatures with ab initio accuracy. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6772. DOI PubMed PMC
88. Zheng, H.; Sivonxay, E.; Christensen, R.; et al. The ab initio non-crystalline structure database: empowering machine learning to
decode diffusivity. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 1469. DOI
89. Huang, P.; Lukin, R.; Faleev, M.; et al. Unveiling the complex structure-property correlation of defects in 2D materials based on high
throughput datasets. npj. 2D. Mater. Appl. 2023, 7, 369. DOI
90. Zhou, Z.; Zhou, Y.; He, Q.; Ding, Z.; Li, F.; Yang, Y. Machine learning guided appraisal and exploration of phase design for high
entropy alloys. npj. Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 265. DOI
91. Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; E, W. DeePKS: a comprehensive data-driven approach toward chemically accurate density functional
theory. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 2021, 17, 170-81. DOI
92. Ou, Q.; Tuo, P.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L. DeePKS model for halide perovskites with the accuracy of a hybrid
functional. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023, 127, 18755-64. DOI
93. Kakkad, J.; Jannu, J.; Sharma, K.; Aggarwal, C.; Medya, S. A survey on explainability of graph neural networks. arXiv 2023,