Page 99 - Read Online

Li et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 43 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2025.17 Page 21 of 23

35. Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Hautier, G.; et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials
innovation. APL. Mater. 2013, 1, 011002. DOI
36. Dunn, A.; Wang, Q.; Ganose, A.; Dopp, D.; Jain, A. Benchmarking materials property prediction methods: the Matbench test set and
Automatminer reference algorithm. npj. Comput. Mater. 2020, 6, 138. DOI
37. Bursch, M.; Mewes, J. M.; Hansen, A.; Grimme, S. Best-practice DFT protocols for basic molecular computational chemistry.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202205735. DOI PubMed PMC
38. Ko, T. W.; Ong, S. P. Data-efficient construction of high-fidelity graph deep learning interatomic potentials. npj. Comput. Mater.
2025, 11, 1550. DOI
39. Batatia, I.; Batzner, S.; Kovács, D. P.; et al. The design space of E(3)-equivariant atom-centred interatomic potentials. Nat. Mach.
Intell. 2025, 7, 56-67. DOI PubMed PMC
40. Fu, X.; Wood, B. M.; Barroso-Luque, L.; et al. Learning smooth and expressive interatomic potentials for physical property
prediction. arXiv 2025, arXiv 2502,12147. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.12147. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
41. Chmiela, S.; Sauceda, H. E.; Müller, K. R.; Tkatchenko, A. Towards exact molecular dynamics simulations with machine-learned
force fields. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3887. DOI PubMed PMC
42. Choudhary, K.; Congo, F. Y.; Liang, T.; Becker, C.; Hennig, R. G.; Tavazza, F. Evaluation and comparison of classical interatomic
potentials through a user-friendly interactive web-interface. Sci. Data. 2017, 4, 160125. DOI PubMed PMC
43. Wilkinson, M. D.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, I. J.; et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and
stewardship. Sci. Data. 2016, 3, 160018. DOI PubMed PMC
44. Blaiszik, B.; Chard, K.; Pruyne, J.; Ananthakrishnan, R.; Tuecke, S.; Foster, I. The materials data facility: data services to advance
materials science research. JOM. 2016, 68, 2045-52. DOI
45. Varughese, B.; Manna, S.; Loeffler, T. D.; Batra, R.; Cherukara, M. J.; Sankaranarayanan, S. K. R. S. Active and transfer learning of
high-dimensional neural network potentials for transition metals. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 20681-92. DOI PubMed
46. Zhang, L.; Lin, D. Y.; Wang, H.; Car, R.; E, W. Active learning of uniformly accurate interatomic potentials for materials simulation.
Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019, 3, 023804. DOI
47. Zhang, L.; Chen, Z.; Su, J.; Li, J. Data mining new energy materials from structure databases. Renew. Sust. Energy. Rev. 2019, 107,
554-67. DOI
48. Focassio, B.; Freitas, L. P. M.; Schleder, G. R. Performance assessment of universal machine learning interatomic potentials:
challenges and directions for materials’ surfaces. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025, 17, 13111-21. DOI PubMed
49. Kim, Y.; Kim, Y.; Yang, C.; Park, K.; Gu, G. X.; Ryu, S. Deep learning framework for material design space exploration using active
transfer learning and data augmentation. npj. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 609. DOI
50. Mosquera-Lois, I.; Kavanagh, S. R.; Ganose, A. M.; Walsh, A. Machine-learning structural reconstructions for accelerated point
defect calculations. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 1303. DOI
51. Omee, S. S.; Fu, N.; Dong, R.; Hu, M.; Hu, J. Structure-based out-of-distribution (OOD) materials property prediction: a benchmark
study. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 1316. DOI
52. Musaelian, A.; Batzner, S.; Johansson, A.; et al. Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics. Nat.
Commun. 2023, 14, 579. DOI PubMed PMC
53. Ma, X.; Chen, H.; He, R.; et al. Active learning of effective Hamiltonian for super-large-scale atomic structures. npj. Comput. Mater.
2025, 11, 1563. DOI
54. Deng, B.; Zhong, P.; Jun, K.; et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic
modelling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2023, 5, 1031-41. DOI
55. Liao, Y. L.; Wood, B.; Das, A.; Smidt, T. EquiformerV2: improved equivariant transformer for scaling to higher-degree
representations. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.12059. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.12059. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
56. Riebesell, J.; Goodall, R. E. A.; Benner, P.; et al. Matbench discovery - a framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability
predictions. arXiv 2023, arXiv.2308.14920. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.14920. (accessed 30 Jun 2025)
57. Merchant, A.; Batzner, S.; Schoenholz, S. S.; Aykol, M.; Cheon, G.; Cubuk, E. D. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery.
Nature 2023, 624, 80-5. DOI PubMed PMC
58. McClean, J. R.; Rubin, N. C.; Lee, J.; et al. What the foundations of quantum computer science teach us about chemistry. J. Chem.
Phys. 2021, 155, 150901. DOI
59. Castelvecchi, D. The AI-quantum computing mash-up: will it revolutionize science? Nature. 2024. DOI PubMed
60. Allen, A. E. A.; Lubbers, N.; Matin, S.; et al. Learning together: towards foundation models for machine learning interatomic
potentials with meta-learning. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 1339. DOI
61. Zhong, Y.; Yu, H.; Yang, J.; Guo, X.; Xiang, H.; Gong, X. Universal machine learning Kohn–Sham Hamiltonian for materials.
Chinese. Phys. Lett. 2024, 41, 077103. DOI
62. Curchod, B. F. E.; Martínez, T. J. Ab initio nonadiabatic quantum molecular dynamics. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 3305-36. DOI
PubMed
63. Babadi, M.; Knap, M.; Martin, I.; Refael, G.; Demler, E. Theory of parametrically amplified electron-phonon superconductivity.
Phys. Rev. B. 2017, 96, 014512. DOI
64. Zou, J.; Zhouyin, Z.; Lin, D.; Zhang, L.; Hou, S.; Gu, Q. Deep learning accelerated quantum transport simulations in nanoelectronics:
from break junctions to field-effect transistors. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.08800. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.08800. (accessed