Page 97 - Read Online

Gesch et al. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 42 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jmi.2025.23 Page 19 of 20

PubMed
26. Tonks, M. R.; Gaston, D.; Millett, P. C.; Andrs, D.; Talbot, P. An object-oriented finite element framework for multiphysics phase
field simulations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012, 51, 20-9. DOI
27. Gültekin, O.; Dal, H.; Holzapfel, G. A. A phase-field approach to model fracture of arterial walls: theory and finite element analysis.
Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2016, 312, 542-66. DOI PubMed PMC
28. Yue, P.; Zhou, C.; Feng, J. J.; Ollivier-Gooch, C. F.; Hu, H. H. Phase-field simulations of interfacial dynamics in viscoelastic fluids
using finite elements with adaptive meshing. J. Comput. Phys. 2006, 219, 47-67. DOI
29. Wang, C.; Wise, S. M. An energy-stable and convergent finite-difference scheme for the modified phase field crystal equation. SIAM.
J. Numer. Anal. 2011, 49, 945-69. DOI
30. Hu, Z.; Wise, S. M.; Wang, C.; Lowengrub, J. S. Stable and efficient finite-difference nonlinear-multigrid schemes for the phase field
crystal equation. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228, 5323-39. DOI
31. Liu, H.; Valocchi, A. J.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, Q. Phase-field-based lattice Boltzmann finite-difference model for simulating
thermocapillary flows. Phys. Rev. E. 2013, 87, 013010. DOI
32. Gain, A. L.; Paulino, G. H. Phase-field based topology optimization with polygonal elements: a finite volume approach for the
evolution equation. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 2012, 46, 327-42. DOI
33. Chen, L. Q.; Shen, J. Applications of semi-implicit Fourier-spectral method to phase field equations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1998,
108, 147-58. DOI
34. Liu, C.; Shen, J. A phase field model for the mixture of two incompressible fluids and its approximation by a Fourier-spectral method.
Physica. D. 2003, 179, 211-28. DOI
35. Feng, W. M.; Yu, P.; Hu, S. Y.; Liu, Z. K.; Du, Q.; Chen, L. Q. Spectral implementation of an adaptive moving mesh method for
phase-field equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2006, 220, 498-510. DOI
36. Shen, J.; Yang, X. An efficient moving mesh spectral method for the phase-field model of two-phase flows. J. Computat. Phys. 2009,
228, 2978-92. DOI
37. Muranushi, T. Paraiso: an automated tuning framework for explicit solvers of partial differential equations. Comput. Sci. Disc. 2012, 5,
015003. DOI
38. Yamanaka, A.; Aoki, T.; Ogawa, S.; Takaki, T. GPU-accelerated phase-field simulation of dendritic solidification in a binary alloy. J.
Cryst. Growth. 2011, 318, 40-5. DOI
39. Dingreville, R.; Roberston, A. E.; Attari, V.; et al. Benchmarking machine learning strategies for phase-field problems. Modelling.
Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 32, 065019. DOI
40. Teichert, G. H.; Garikipati, K. Machine learning materials physics: surrogate optimization and multi-fidelity algorithms predict
precipitate morphology in an alternative to phase field dynamics. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2019, 344, 666-93. DOI
41. Teichert, G.; Natarajan, A.; Van der Ven, A.; Garikipati, K. Machine learning materials physics: integrable deep neural networks
enable scale bridging by learning free energy functions. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2019, 353, 201-16. DOI
42. Wang, Z.; Huan, X.; Garikipati, K. Variational system identification of the partial differential equations governing the physics of
pattern-formation: inference under varying fidelity and noise. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2019, 356, 44-74. DOI
43. Yabansu, Y. C.; Steinmetz, P.; Hötzer, J.; Kalidindi, S. R.; Nestler, B. Extraction of reduced-order process-structure linkages from
phase-field simulations. Acta. Mater. 2017, 124, 182-94. DOI
44. Herman, E.; Stewart, J. A.; Dingreville, R. A data-driven surrogate model to rapidly predict microstructure morphology during
physical vapor deposition. Appl. Math. Model. 2020, 88, 589-603. DOI
45. Montes de Oca Zapiain, D.; Stewart, J. A.; Dingreville, R. Accelerating phase-field-based microstructure evolution predictions via
surrogate models trained by machine learning methods. npj. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 471. DOI
46. Hu, C.; Martin, S.; Dingreville, R. Accelerating phase-field predictions via recurrent neural networks learning the microstructure
evolution in latent space. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2022, 397, 115128. DOI
47. Fetni, S.; Pham, T. Q. D.; Hoang, T. V.; et al. Capabilities of auto-encoders and principal component analysis of the reduction of
microstructural images; application on the acceleration of phase-field simulations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2023, 216, 111820. DOI
48. Wu, P.; Iquebal, A. S.; Ankit, K. Emulating microstructural evolution during spinodal decomposition using a tensor decomposed
convolutional and recurrent neural network. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2023, 224, 112187. DOI
49. Ahmad, O.; Kumar, N.; Mukherjee, R.; Bhowmick, S. Accelerating microstructure modeling via machine learning: a method
combining Autoencoder and ConvLSTM. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2023, 7, 083802. DOI
50. Zhou, X.; Sun, S.; Cai, S.; et al. Accelerating three-dimensional phase-field simulations via deep learning approaches. J. Mater. Sci.
2024, 59, 15727-37. DOI
51. Oommen, V.; Shukla, K.; Desai, S.; Dingreville, R.; Karniadakis, G. E. Rethinking materials simulations: blending direct numerical
simulations with neural operators. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 1319. DOI
52. Jokisaari, A.; Voorhees, P.; Guyer, J.; Warren, J.; Heinonen, O. Benchmark problems for numerical implementations of phase field
models. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017, 126, 139-51. DOI
53. Balluffi, R. W.; Allen, S. M.; Carter, W. C. Kinetics of materials. John Wiley & Sons; 2005. DOI
54. Allen, S. M.; Cahn, J. W. A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coarsening.
Acta. Metall. 1979, 27, 1085-95. DOI
55. Stewart, J. A.; Dingreville, R. Microstructure morphology and concentration modulation of nanocomposite thin-films during simulated