Page 622 - Read Online
P. 622

Page 10 of 24                       Peyvandi et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:44  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2019.16

               acute lymphoblastic leukemia, colorectal, lung, liver and breast cancers [190-196] . In addition, chemotherapy
               pre-exposed DTC may develop mechanisms of chemoresistance and become less responsive to subsequent
               chemotherapies, as is often observed at relapse in patients. CSCs have been shown to be chemo-resistant and
               to be responsible for post-therapy relapses [197] . Chemotherapy causes enrichment of CSCs thereby facilitating
               recurrences and resistance to further chemotherapies in multiple cancers including glioma, ovarian, liver,
               colon, breast cancers [197] . Resistance involves multiple mechanisms, such as activation of signaling pathways
               prominent in stem cells (e.g., WNT, NOTCH, HEDGEHOG) [198-200] , but also pathways that are frequently
               mutated and activated in cancer, in particular the EGFR-HER2/PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTORC pathway [198,200,201] .
               CSC are often enriched at sites of chronic hypoxia leading to the activation of the HIF pathway [200,202] .
               Interestingly, HIF activation leads to the initiation of protective pathways, including WNT and NOTCH,
               and genes of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) drug transporter family members, such as MDR1, MRP1
               and ABCG2 which are responsible for the efflux of cytotoxic drugs from the cells [203-208] . Additional, HIF-
               independent mechanisms have been reported [209] . In short, the mechanisms behind the long-term beneficial
               effects of adjuvant chemotherapy remain in part elusive and cannot be fully explained by the direct cytotoxic
               activity of chemotherapy as dormant/CSC that are mostly responsible for late relapses that are highly
               resistant to chemotherapy.


               IMMUNE RESPONSE AND CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER
               Cumulating evidence indicates that tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) play an active role in controlling
                                                                                                         +
               progression and clinical outcome in breast cancer, particularly in highly proliferative TNBC and HER2
               cancers [210-212] , and in conjunction with chemotherapy [213,214] . This is particularly relevant to TNBC, as these
                                                                       +
               cancers present the richest presence of TILs, most notably CD8  T lymphocytes, and tertiary lymphoid
               structures [211,215,216] . Increased numbers of infiltrating TIL in TNBC, are associated with an improved
               pathological complete response to chemotherapy [217] , decreased rates of recurrences and improved
               survival [210,216,218] . Evaluation of TILs in breast cancer has been recommended as an immunological
               biomarker with prognostic and potentially predictive values, mainly in TNBC and HER2-amplified breast
               cancers [219] . In TNBC, expression of antigen presenting MHC class II pathway molecules is associated with
               a better outcome, consistent with the hypothesis that a functional antigen presentation pathway may trigger
               a protective antitumor immune response in response to chemotherapy [220] . Ladoire et al. [221]  demonstrated
               that pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast carcinoma resulted in the
                                                      +
               disappearance of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3  regulatory T cells and the increase in tumor infiltrating
                            +
               cytotoxic TiA1  and granzyme B  T cells, consistent with the induction of an antitumor immune response
                                           +
               by chemotherapy. While the association between lymphocytic infiltrates, and improved outcome after
               chemotherapy appears to be strongest in TNBC and HER2  breast cancer subtypes, the association with
                                                                  +
               luminal tumors is less clear, and may be limited by the reduced immune infiltration or by the greater tumor
               heterogeneity of these tumors [222] . Several recent experimental studies have shown that chemotherapy can
               induce a therapeutic anti-tumor immune response. For example, Ma et al. [223,224] , reported that anthracycline-
               based chemotherapy induces the release of ATP by dying breast cancer cells, which promotes the
                                                        +
                                                  +
                                                             high
               recruitment and differentiation of CD11c CD11b Ly6C  antigen presenting cells. Depletion or preventing
               tumor infiltration by these cells abolished the anti-tumor immune responses elicited by anthracyclines [223,224] .
               Besides these desired immunological effects, chemotherapy can also induce unwanted, immune-mediated
               tumor-promoting effects. For example, increased expression of TNFa in the breast tumor microenvironment
               due to chemotherapy, induces CXCL1/2 expression via NF-κB activation in breast cancer cells and
               initiates a paracrine loop involving myeloid cell-derived S100A8/9 to enhance cancer cell survival and
               chemo-resistance. Inhibition of CXCR2 blunt this TNFa-induced response and augments the efficacy of
               chemotherapy, particularly against breast cancer metastasis [225] .
   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627