Page 589 - Read Online
P. 589

Ralph et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2018;4:49  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.42                             Page 9 of 26

               migration [49-51]  and metastasis [52-54] , and also induces multidrug resistance to chemotherapy by upregulating
               expression of the multidrug resistance proteins (MDR)/P-glycoprotein/ABC drug transporters [55,56] . In this
                                                                                                        [57]
               regard, NRF2 functions in a similar manner during ischemia-reperfusion of normal tissues in the body
               as well as in the metabolic shift that occurs during induced pluripotent stem cell colony formation with
               reprogramming after an initial burst of OxPhos and increased ROS production which increases NRF2
                                                                                                       [58]
               before a temporal peak in HIF-1 mediated glycolysis and shuttling via the pentose phosphate pathway .
               In a related fashion a recent study showed that NRF2 activation also promotes the Warburg effect and
                                                              [59]
               stemness-associated properties of cancer-initiating cells .

               Although it is well known that NRF2 and HIF-1 signaling are both regulated in response to intermittent
               hypoxia and ROS accumulation [Figures 2 and 3], the evidence suggests that these two signaling pathways
               are not simply linked by cellular context but interact to promote metastasis and play complementary
               roles. For example, in the state of chemoresistance induced by hypoxia they both increase expression of
                                                                    [8]
               the multidrug resistance MDR/P-glycoproteins (reviewed in ). The HIF-1 promoter contains two AREs
               and has been shown to be negatively regulated by NRF1 but is probably also activated by NRF2 during
                                                                                                       [60]
                                  [60]
               intermittent hypoxia . However, during constant hypoxia, only HIF-1 is increased but not NRF2 .
               Hence, when limiting O  levels required for OxPhos are available, a build-up in tricarboxylic acid cycle
                                    2
               intermediate metabolites (such as fumarate, succinate or oxaloacetate) can occur, which inhibits prolyl
                                                   [61]
               hydroxylase (PHD) activity (reviewed in ). The ensuing still relatively low ROS level (i.e., moderate
               oxidative stress) produced by the dysfunctional mitochondria in cells under moderate hypoxia also helps
                                 [62]
               inactivate the PHDs . The net effect is to prevent the enzymes such as PHD2 from targeting HIF for
               ubiquination and proteasomal degradation [Figure 4]. Thus, hypoxia results in stabilization and activation
               of HIF-1 as part of the homeostatic mechanism to mediate adaptive responses via altered gene expression
                          [63]
               (reviewed in ).

               One critical cell-autonomous adaptive response to hypoxia controlled by HIF-1 is to act as a feedback
               regulator to lower mitochondrial mass (by inhibiting PGC1α, as outlined above) and alter mitochondrial
               and cytosolic metabolism (reviewed in [61,64] ). Thus, HIF-1 is one of the main factors that mediates
               the adaptive metabolic responses to hypoxia, increasing glycolytic pathway flux and decreasing flux
               through the tricarboxylic acid cycle, in order to return mitochondrial ROS production to more normal
               low levels [65-67] . HIF-1 and NRF2 also help mediate increased flux through the serine synthesis pathway
               and mitochondrial one-carbon (folate cycle) metabolism to increase mitochondrial production of
               antioxidants (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and GSH). In this manner, HIF
               and NRF mediated reprogramming functions to protect cells from excessive oxidative stress and levels
               of mitochondrial ROS production, albeit promoting survival of cancer cells with heightened redox and
               greater oxidative status.

               The evidence above provides clear support for mut-p53/NRF2 and HIF-1 in reprogramming metastatic
               cancer cell metabolism by blocking GSH production while increasing the pentose phosphate shunt in order
               to provide the NADPH required for Trx production to compensate for GSH loss and to buffer the resulting
               increased ROS levels in these cells to within a range that is beneficial for tumor progression. In 2015, stud-
               ies were undertaken that specifically analyzed the importance of these antioxidant pathways and their role
                                             [68]
               in cancer initiation vs. progression . A range of murine cancer models deficient in Gclm (encoding the
               modifier or regulatory subunit of γ-ECS) showed that the inherent decreased GSH production caused de-
               layed tumor initiation, invasiveness and progression, consistent with observations across a range of human
                      [68]
               cancers . These studies also examined several drugs such as BSO to inhibit γ-ECS either used alone or
               combined with sulfasalazine (SSA) to block the Xc-glutamate/cystine antiporter and reduce cystine uptake
               or auranofin (AUR) to inhibit the enzyme TrxR. Early BSO (20 mmol/L) treatment in the drinking water
                                                                              -/-
               of young animals dramatically reduced breast cancer burdens in the Gclm  mouse models, increasing oxi-
   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594