Page 145 - Read Online
P. 145

McKenna et al                                                                                                                                                                                     Hypoxia in prostate cancer

           Table 1: Reported values of the partial pO 2  in human tumors and corresponding normal tissues
           Tumor type           n     Median tumor   Median %   n    Median   Median %   Fold pO 2    Reference
                                                    oxygen           normal    oxygen   decrease a
                                          pO 2
                                                                    tissue pO 2
           Brain (6)            104       13          1.7     104      26        3.4        2          [11]
           Head and neck cancer   592     10          1.3              ND        5.9       4.5         [11]
           (13)                 30        12.2        1.6      14      40        5.3       3.3         [88]
                                23        14.7        1.9      30     43.8       5.8        3          [89]
                                65        14.6        1.9      65     51.2       6.7       3.5         [90]
           Lung cancer          6         14.3        1.9              ND        5.6        3          [91]
                                20        16.6        2.2             42.8       5.6       2.6         [92]
           Breast cancer (10)   212       10          1.3     212      52        6.8       5.2        [11,93]
           Pancreatic cancer    7         2.7         0.4      7      51.6       6.8      19.1         [94]
                                1          2          0.3                                 22.7         [95]
           Prostate cancer      59        2.4         0.3      59      30        3.9      12.5 b       [96]
                                55        4.5         0.6              ND                  6.7 b       [97]
                                10        9.4         1.2      2      26.2       3.4       2.8 c       [98]
           Melanoma             18        11.6        1.5      20     40.5       5.3       3.5         [99]
           Rectal carcinoma     14        32          4.2              52        6.8       1.6        [100]
                                15        19          2.5              52        6.8       2.7        [101]
           Sarcoma (14)         283       14          1.8     283      51        6.7       3.6         [11]
           The data in the table is adapted with permission from a review by McKeown (2014). The number of studies included for each tumor type
                                                                                         a
           is indicated by the number in the “tumor type” column. Other data are from single studies, as referenced.  Fold reduction of tumor vs.
                                                                            b
           normal tissue is based on all the data presented in the table (except prostate; see below);  fold reduction calculated on contemporaneous
                                     c
           measurements in the psoas muscle;  data from a pilot study that included values from the “normal” prostate of two bladder cancer patients.
           ND: not determined; pO 2 : pressure of oxygen
           instability [14] , endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition [15,16]   case of the metabolically distinct anthraquinone-
           and selection of cells with diminished apoptotic potential   derived compounds, unidirectional HAPs (uHAPs). This
           and a greater invasive potential [17,18] . These plethora   review will focus on the therapeutic potential of these
           of changes means that the presence of hypoxia has   compounds in targeting hypoxic tumor cells, although
           significant implications for cancer therapy [11,19] . Indeed,   the molecular targeting of hypoxia factors such as HIF
           as far back as the 1950s, it was realised that hypoxia is   is an equally valid strategy for targeting hypoxia and is
           an underlying cause of resistance to radiotherapy [20,21] .   reviewed elsewhere [30,33] .
           Since  then  it  has  been  consistently  shown  that  high
           levels of hypoxia significantly correlate with increasing   The  concept underpinning the use of HAPs is well-
           clinical  stage  and can predict biochemical failure   established and several recent reviews exist, which we
           following radiotherapy [22] . Recent studies have shown   refer to for further understanding [32,33] . When oxygen
           that hypoxic conditions significantly enhances exosome   levels are very low HAPs or uHAPs are reduced to
           secretion in a HIF-1α-dependent way [23] . Exosomes are   covalently-binding  active  cytotoxins  or  release  DNA-
           microvesicles containing a cargo of signature proteins,   damaging radicals [31,32] . Thus the incorporation  of
           lipids, nucleic acid and metabolites that can contribute   a HAP into a treatment regime should be an ideal
           to the remodelling of the tissue microenvironment [24,25] .   approach to specifically target tumor cells, particularly
           In prostate cancer models they have been shown to   as hypoxia is rare in normal tissues [34] . Other
           mediate angiogenesis, cell stemness and activation   properties for an effective HAP, discussed throughout
           of the surrounding tumor stroma    [26] . Similarly,   this review, include (1) the ability to reach hypoxic
           hypoxia has been linked with increased resistance   cells, (2) pharmacological features which allow it to be
           to chemotherapeutic drugs [27,28] . Therefore, hypoxia   metabolised effectively, and (3) exertion of a lasting,
           is  clearly  a  significant  obstacle  to  the  effective   targeted effect on the tumor [32] . With these in mind
           treatment of tumors, so it is a viable therapeutic   several compounds have been developed and tested
           strategy to directly target hypoxic tumor cells in an   in vitro, in vivo and in patients with different cancers
           attempt to improve treatment [27,29,30] . Although such a   [Table 2 and Figure 2].
           strategy has yet to establish clinical acceptance, one
           of  the  most  promising  translational  approaches  for   However, although encouraging results have been
           patient treatment is based on the use of bioreductive   obtained from preclinical studies many of the HAPs
           drugs [31,32] . These are now more commonly known   listed in Table 2 have not been realised in clinical trials.
           as hypoxia activated prodrugs (HAPs) or, in the    Currently,  only  a  few  of  these  molecules  are  being
                           Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 4 ¦ March 1, 2018           3
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150