Page 38 - Read Online
P. 38

Warawdekar et al.                                                                                                                                           CTCs from patients with metastatic breast cancer

           Table 2: Tricolor flow cytometry for enumeration of CTC   as well  as control samples  showed  Ct values  lower
           done as described in Methods (complements Figure 3)  than 30 for GAPDH. From the 17 patient samples, 14
                                Number of dual positive cells   (82%) gave Ct values below 36. Of the 14, 9 (64%)
            Patient number
                                   [EpCAM+ CK+] CTCs          were  found to be positive  for two marker genes,  10
            1                              25                 (71.4%) for EpCAM, 9 (64%) for CK19, and 6 (43%) for
            2                              36                 Muc-1. There were two samples that were positive for
            3                              85                 all the four markers, with a high copy number recorded
            4                              60                 for Her2. Her2 expression levels were comparable to
            5                              15                 protein levels obtained by IHC, which was reported as
            6                              15
            7                              27                 3+. In the 15 control samples, 4 recorded Ct values
            8                              21                 that could be converted to copies/mL and these values
            9                              50                 were below 1.
            11                             7
            13                             1                  Imaging CTCs
            14                             3                  In blood samples from patients,  where CTCs were
            15                             4                  higher, captured cells were subjected to morphological
            16                             8
            17                             15                 characterization  and  examined  for presence  of a
            20                             19
            22                             6
            For 5 patients only
            RT-PCR no flow
            Normal individual
            number            Number of dual positive cells [EpCAM + CK]
            1                              8
            2                              4
            3                              14
            4                              7
            5                              7
            6                              3
            7                              8
            9                              0
            10                             1
            17                             2
            18                             6
            19                             7
            20                             2
            For 6 normal individuals only RT-PCR done
            Flow cytometry not
            done
            One sample lost
            during enrichment
           CTC:  circulating  tumor  cell;  RT-PCR:  reverse  transcription
           polymerase chain reaction; CK: cytokeratin


















                                                                                            [22]
                                                              Figure 4: Standard curve for Aerts et al.  method for T47-D cell
           Figure 3: Tri color flow cytometry for CTC enumeration. CK+/  line. (A) Log number of EpCAM-positive cells versus Delta Ct
           EpCAM+ dual-positive cells represent CTCs seen in positive   (EpCAM-GAPDH); (B) log number of CK-19-positive cells versus
           enriched fraction. The number of dual-positive cells in patient and   Delta Ct (CK-19-GAPDH); (C) log number of MUC-1-positive cells
           normal healthy individuals is shown. CTC: circulating tumor cell  versus Delta Ct (MUC-1-GAPDH)
            30                                                                 Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 3 ¦ February 23, 2017
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43