Page 372 - Read Online
P. 372

Sommariva                                                                                                                                                                                       Liver metastases and HIPEC

           Table 1: Comparative studies of CS + HIPEC ± LR for peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver metastases from
           colorectal cancer
                                          Study    Study sample  Peritoneal   Liver    Major       Ablative
                                          period      (liver      load   metastases hepatectomy   techniques
           Studies                                  metastasis)   (PCI)    (median       (n)         (n)
                                                                          and range)
           Wake Forest University        1991-2007  14/142 (9%)    NR       1 (1-7)      1       6 thermal cryo
           Winston-Salem, USA [29]                                                                 ablation,
                                                                                                 4 cryotherapy,
                                                                                                2 radiofrequency
           Uppsala University, Sweden [30]  1994-2010  11/22 (50%)  13 vs. 13  1 (1-3)   2            -
           Gustave-Roussy Institute, France [20]  1995-2010  37/156 (23.7%)  10 vs. 11  2 (1-16)   12  7 radiofrequency
           St George Hospital, Sidney, Australia [31]  1997-2008  16/55 (29%)  8 vs. 12^  2 ( 1-7)  2   4 cryotherapy
           Université Catholique de Louvain,   2007-2015  25/77 (32.5%)  6 vs. 10  NR    2      1 radiofrequency
           Belgium [32]
           ^Mean. CS: cytoreductive surgery; HIPEC: hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; LR: liver resection; PCI: peritoneal cancer index;
           NR: not reported

           more appropriate treatments and directs the group   were sequential, performing liver resection after CS +
           with limited peritoneal carcinomatosis to a more   HIPEC.
           appropriate approach with HIPEC.
                                                              Patients selected for CS + HIPEC + LR presented
           PATIENT SELECTION FOR CS + HIPEC + LR              with limited liver disease, as suggested by the
                                                              median number of nodules (in general between 1
                                                              and 2), the rare occurrence of major resection and
           For colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis, cytoreductive   the frequent use of ablative techniques (cryotherapy,
           surgery, normally adopted in the context of a multimodal   radiofrequency) [20,29-32]  [Table 1 and Figure 1]. On
           approach  of  surgery  followed  by  intraperitoneal   the other hand, peritoneal load probably reflects the
           chemotherapy, offer a significant survival advantage   same tumor diffusion of patients selected for CS
           in selected patients treated in a high volume tertiary   + HIPEC only, where a PCI index less than 20 is
           center [24] . Surgery, which represents the first step of   considered by the majority of referral centers as the
           the procedure, was standardized twenty years ago and   preoperative cut-off value in selecting patients for
           consists of visceral resections and peritonectomies in   treatment.
           various combinations [10] . The main surgical goal is to
           obtain an optimal cytoreduction with a macroscopic   Analysing the prognostic factor, peritoneal and liver
           residual disease of less than 2.5 mm. Intraperitoneal   tumor load seems to have the most important impact
           drug is delivered intra-operatively under hyperthermic   on outcome. These data are in concordance with
           conditions after completion of CS (HIPEC) [25] . The   previous reports on surgical treatment of multiple
           more important prognostic factor for patient selection   sites MCC; the presence of multiple extra-hepatic site
           for CS + HIPEC are the grade of cytoreduction and   and more than five liver metastasis were the only two
           the peritoneal tumor load [19,20] . Although a locoregional   variables correlated with survival [14] . More recently a
           approach, CS + HIPEC has been considered           tumor load-based nomogram have been proposed
           contraindicated in the presence of systemic disease   for patients with potentially resectable synchronous
           and patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and liver   peritoneal and liver metastases [20] . Although not
           metastases were usually deemed not suitable for
           treatment and referred to oncologist for systemic   yet prospectively validated, this simple nomogram
           chemotherapy.                                      combines as prognostic predictors the number
                                                              of LM and the PCI and represents an interesting
                                                              decision-making tool that could aid clinicians during
           The encouraging data on the curative role of surgery
           for liver metastases made CS + HIPEC combined with   multidisciplinary discussion to evaluate the most
           liver resection a less stringent contraindication [18,20] .   appropriate treatment.
           Over the last few years, an increasing number of
           studies investigated the role of LR in patients selected   ASSESSMENT OF MORBIDITY AND
           for CS + HIPEC [26-28] . In some cases, the treatment   MORTALITY
           of LM was done after intra-operative finding [28] , but
           in the majority of cases resection was planned with   An important issue arises from the potential increase
           respect to pre-operative staging. In a few cases, liver   in morbidity and mortality of combining CS + HIPEC
           metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment   to LR, both considered two surgical procedures
            364                                                             Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment ¦ Volume 3 ¦ December 21, 2017
   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377