Page 56 - Read Online
P. 56

Page 4 of 11         Tirelli et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2023;9:20  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.98























                Figure 1. Lymph nodes of the submandibular area according to Rouviere’s classification. AVF: Anterior Facial Vein; SM: submandibular
                Vein; SG: submandibular Gland; A: prevascular node a.k.a. Node of Stahr; B: retrovascular node; C: preglandular node; D: retroglandular
                node; E: intraglandular nodes. A+B aka Perifacial nodes; A+B+C+D aka Perimarginal nodes.


               PREGLANDULAR NODES
               The preglandular nodes are the other subgroup of submandibular nodes identified by Rouvière that is of
               particular scientific interest. The preglandular nodes are those nodes situated in the triangular space
               bounded posteriorly by the submandibular gland, superiorly by the mandible and inferiorly and anteriorly
               by the anterior belly of the digastric muscle. Frequently, the preglandular nodes are in contact with the
               submental vein and embedded in fibrofatty tissue above the mylohyoid muscle . Ballenger, in his
                                                                                        [14]
               milestone textbook “Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery” describes the preglandular nodes as a group of
               submandibular triangle nodes that serve as the primary drainage site for cancers of the buccal and lingual
               mucosa. Indeed, the superficial lymphatic vessels of the mouth floor and gingival system connect with each
               other before draining into the preglandular nodes. Ballenger also states that the deep collecting system
               drains into the preglandular nodes before draining into the subdigastric nodes . In 2003, Abe et al.
                                                                                      [21]
               analyzed 90 formalin-fixed cadaveric specimens in order to study the lymph vessels of the submandibular
               nodes . Afferent vessels were not always identified, while efferent vessels were a constant finding. In 19/20
                    [22]
               (95%) specimens, collecting vessels appearing on the mylohyoid surface and emptying into the pregandular
               nodes were identified. The authors demonstrated how the collecting vessel system was still unclear, but in
               some specimens, they described direct lymphatic drainage vessels which originate from the oral region and
               pass through the mylohyoid muscle before draining into the preglandular nodes . Few studies have
                                                                                        [22]
               addressed the specific incidence of metastasis to the preglandular lymph nodes; DiNardo found metastases
               in preglandular nodes in 4/41 (9.8%) patients who had SCC of the floor of mouth .
                                                                                   [14]

               PERIMARGINAL NODES
               In 2018, a prospective study by our group described a group of submandibular nodes at risk of being left
               undissected during ND performed with the Hayes Martin maneuver . The study recruited 47 patients (for
                                                                         [13]
               a total of 62 neck dissections) with oral, oropharyngeal and facial skin SCC with clinically negative necks.
               Following the classical steps of ND, they dissected the AFV until they reached the inferior border of the
               mandible. All nodes lying adjacent to the AFV within 1 to 2 cm below the mandibular border that were
               superficial to or contained within the superficial cervical fascia were considered nodes at risk and were all
               removed separately from the ND specimen. To avoid injury to the marginal mandibular nerve, the
               dissection was performed with the support of nerve integrity monitoring [13,23,24] . In 84% of specimens, they
               found at least one node that would have been left undissected if the Hayes Martin maneuver had been
                        [13]
               performed . The mean greatest diameter of these nodes was 12.5 mm; no other studies have ever described
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61