Page 22 - Read Online
P. 22

Page 4 of 14      Fujimoto et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:66  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.157

               evaluating the prognosis by the site of disease origin. In fact, another study reported that prognosis does not
                                                                                  [20]
               significantly differ between the two groups in subgroup analyses by disease stage .
               There are no prognostic models for ANKL. In general, the prognosis of this disease is extremely poor, with a
                                                                                    [21]
               median OS of 2-3 months [5,11,12] , except for that of the subacute-type ANKL . Allogeneic stem cell
               transplantation is the only curative treatment and could be the most important factor for survival. Patients
               with subacute ANKL have symptoms of infectious mononucleosis for more than 90 days prior to the
               fulminant onset, and the prognosis is significantly better than that of typical ANKL, with a median OS of
                      [21]
               214 days . ANKL originating from EBV-associated NK/T cell lymphoproliferative diseases such as chronic
               active EBV infection has been reported , but its clinical course and prognosis are not well known.
                                                [13]
               TREATMENT OF NK-CELL LYMPHOMA
               The recommended algorithm of treatments for ENKL patients is shown in Figure 1. The scheme is divided
               based on the extent of disease (limited vs. advanced). The history of treatment development is further
               shown in Table 1.


               Limited-stage ENKL
               For limited-stage ENKL, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is recommended as a first-line therapy.
                                                                                                       [22]
               Radiotherapy (RT) has been used as an effective treatment for limited-stage ENKL since the 1980s .
                                                                                                    [23]
               Although RT-containing treatment provides significantly better outcomes for limited-stage ENKL , RT
               alone frequently induces local or systemic treatment failure in more than 50% of patients [24-26] . Several
               studies have shown that the recommended dose of RT that is necessary for local control of limited-stage
               ENKL is 50 Gy or more [23,27,28] . A combination of CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and
               prednisone) and RT is an established treatment for localized non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and it is also used to
               treat ENKL patients . However, because normal and abnormal NK cells express multidrug resistant
                                 [29]
               (MDR)-associated  P-glycoprotein [30,31] , anthracycline-containing  regimens  such  as  CHOP  are  not
               satisfactory for treating ENKL patients, with a five-year OS of less than 50%, even combined with RT [6,24,32,33] .
               In addition, chemotherapy followed by RT was shown to yield a worse response rate than RT followed by
               chemotherapy for limited-stage ENKL in a few studies [22,34,35] . Based on these experiences, several CCRT
               regimens have been developed as novel anti-MDR treatments for limited-stage ENKL patients since the
               early 2000s [36-38] . These regimens consist of non-MDR-associated anti-cancer agents, such as platinum
               derivatives, and ifosfamide (IFM), L-asp which has in vitro sensitivity against an NK cell tumor cell line ,
                                                                                                       [39]
               or etoposide (ETP) which is known to be effective against EBV-associated hemophagocytic syndrome [40,41] .
               One of the most popular CCRT regimens is RT-2/3DeVIC (dexamethasone, ETP, IFM, and carboplatin) ,
                                                                                                       [36]
               which includes concurrent RT of 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions with three cycles of a two-third dose of
               DeVIC. The efficacy of RT-2/3DeVIC therapy for newly diagnosed stage IE or contiguous IIE ENKL
               patients is better with a two-year OS of 78% and an overall response rate (ORR) of 81%, relative to the
               historical data. The adverse events (AEs) of RT-2/3DeVIC are acceptable. There have been no treatment-
               related deaths and only neutropenia was reported as a Grade 4 AE, developing in more than 20% of the
               patients. Other CCRT regimens used in Korea, such as CCRT-VIPD [ETP, IFM, cisplatin (CDDP), and
               dexamethasone (DEX)] and CCRT-VIDL (ETP, IFM, DEX, and L-asp) [37,38] , have common characteristics
               such as RT with a median of 40 Gy conducted with weekly CDDP monotherapy, and then combination
               chemotherapy is conducted after RT completion. VIPD is given every three weeks for three cycles after 3-5
                                                   [37]
               weeks from the time of CCRT completion . VIDL is similar to VIPD, but L-asp is used instead of CDDP
               every other day from Day 8 to Day 20, as in the SMILE regimen [38,42] . VIDL is given every three weeks for
               two cycles after 3-4 weeks from the time of CCRT completion . Compared to the RT-2/3DeVIC regimen,
                                                                    [38]
               these regimens include a lower dose of RT and take a longer time to complete the treatment, but both
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27