Page 28 - Read Online
P. 28

Mansinho et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:44  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.88  Page 9 of 12

                                        Table 3. Typical characteristics of BM in renal cell carcinoma
                               Clinical and pathologic features of renal cell carcinoma BM
                               · Mostly osteolytic [15]
                                              [29-31]
                               · High c-MET expression
                                                                      [76]
                               · Radioresistant [require high biologically effective dose (BED)]
                                                      [80]
                               · Highly vascularized and destructive
                                                       [79]
               short-term survival after spinal metastasectomy .

               In many cases, treatment goals for patients with BM do not include complete SM, but instead palliative
               surgery combined with non-surgical treatment to preserve or restore neurological function and improve
               pain control . Spinal metastases can represent a particularly difficult case with regards to symptoms and
                          [80]
               treatment, as neurological pain is often added to nociceptive pain, and neurological impairment can be
               observed. Due to close contact with the spinal cord, spinal BM treatment is challenging and requires a
               multidisciplinary approach .
                                      [81]

               CONCLUSION
               BM and SREs increase economic burden and decrease QoL, ultimately increasing morbidity throughout the
               metastatic disease course. Additionally, the overall prognosis of these patient is poor, compared with
               patients without BM. Advances in systemic and ablative therapy have improved these patients’ outcomes in
               recent years. BM in patients with RCC may have a special sensitivity to drugs targeting c-Met, and
               administration of BTAs can further improve time to SREs and minimize QoL deterioration. Combining and
               sequencing all these resources can be complex, making multidisciplinary intervention of utmost importance
               to maximize patient outcomes and treatment.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               Joana Cavaco Silva is a scientific and biomedical consultant and a senior medical writer for the Medical
               Oncology Deparment of CHULN.


               Authors’ contributions
               Contributed significantly and similarly to the conceptualization, writing and review of the article:
               Mansinho A, Nejo P, Leitão T, Casimiro S, Costa L


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               Luís Costa has received research grants from Amgen, Bayer, Novartis and Roche, speaker honoraria from
               Amgen, Bayer, Janssen, Lilly and Roche, and is also a consultant for Amgen, Novartis and Servier. André
               Mansinho has received honoraria as consultant/speaker from Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb,
               Janssen, Merck-Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, OMPharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier,
               Travel/Logistics support from Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Merck
               Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, OMPharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier and Research funding from
               Bayer.
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33