Page 117 - Read Online
P. 117

Feuer et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:68  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.164  Page 3 of 12

               Nuclear medicine may play a role in mRCC diagnosis and staging. Positron emission tomography
                                                                                                       [11]
               (PET)/CT represents a modality that may provide better sensitivity for the diagnosis of metastases .
               Fluorine 18-sodium fluoride ligand has been demonstrated to be sensitive for the detection of bone
                        [10]
               metastases . More recently, PET/CT using Zr-89-girentuximab, a monoclonal antibody-based ligand, was
               demonstrated to be more sensitive than CT alone, than F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F)-PET/CT for detecting
                                                                                 [12]
               bone and soft tissue lesions in patients with good and intermediate-risk mRCC .
               THE ROLE OF METASTASECTOMY IN SPECIFIC ORGAN SITES
               The role of metastasectomy has been reviewed extensively in the literature, often in series assessing the role
               of metastasectomy by specific organ site. Metastasectomy outcomes by organ site are summarized in
               Table 1.


               Lung
               The role of metastasectomy in the management of pulmonary metastases in the setting of mRCC has been
               well-characterized. Pfannschmidt et al.  retrospectively assessed pulmonary metastasectomy in 191
                                                  [13]
               patients, including patients with no primary tumor site recurrence and no extrapulmonary metastases.
               Complete resection was achieved in 145 cases. This study demonstrated an overall 5-year survival of 36.9%,
               41.5% in patients who underwent complete resection vs. 22.1% amongst those with partial resections. The
               authors dichotomized prognostic indicators based on values that demonstrated the most significant
               discrimination between good and poor outcomes. They noted a significant survival difference amongst
               patients with < 7 metastases as compared to ≥ 7 individual sites (46.8% vs. 14.5%). Finally, they noted that
               DFI greater than 23 months was associated with an improvement in 5-year survival (47% vs. 24.7%) .
                                                                                                  [13]
               A German study analyzed the impact of the histologic characteristics of the primary tumor on survival in
               107 consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy. Complete resections were performed in
               97.2% of patients, and 33.6% received systemic therapy prior to pulmonary metastasectomy. The mean
               survival was 63.4 months with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 47% and 9%, respectively. The authors found
               that node status, primary tumor histologic grade, and primary tumor stage were all associated with worse
               survival outcomes despite metastasectomy. The effect of systemic therapy was not evaluated. [14]

               Kudelin et al.  reviewed 116 patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy with intrathoracic lymph
                          [15]
               node dissection. In this cohort, 34.5% of patients had systemic therapy prior to metastasectomy. Five- and
               ten-year survival was noted to be 49% and 21%, respectively. Age > 70, female gender and the number of
               metastases were noted to be poor prognostic factors. Only age > 70 remained significant in multivariate
               analysis .
                      [15]
                                          [16]
               More recently, Saricam  et al.  evaluated the role of pulmonary metastasectomy in 48 patients,
               demonstrating a median survival of 56.2 months, with a 5-year survival of 62.5%. The study noted that DFI
               > 32 months, fewer, and smaller volume metastases (< 4 cc ) were factors associated with better prognosis .
                                                                3
                                                                                                       [16]
               Bone
               Bone metastases are present in approximately 40% of patients with mRCC . To assess prognostic
                                                                                    [3]
                                  [17]
               indicators, Kume et al.  reviewed 94 patients with bone metastases at multiple tertiary referral centers. The
               authors noted that sarcomatoid differentiation, vertebral bone involvement, concurrent non-bone
               metastases, alkaline phosphatase increases > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, and C-reactive protein
               increases > 0.3 mg/dL were associated with poor prognosis .
                                                                [17]
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122