Page 23 - Read Online
P. 23

Page 8 of 11                           Tulotta et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:74  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2019.022

               with primary tumours are treated, when possible, with surgery. However, metastasis can occur years
                                      [100]
               after surgical intervention . Metastatic cancer associates with poor patient prognosis and represent a
               major challenge for clinical research. Chemotherapy is often the pharmacological choice to treat cancer,
               although side effects alter normal cell physiology and affect patient life quality. Moreover, cancer relapse
               and therapy resistance associate with poor prognosis. Progress in biomedical research has shown that
               targeting cancer cells is not the only therapeutic option. The interaction between tumour and surrounding
               stroma supports cancer survival and spreading, representing therefore a possible new treatment
                      [101]
               strategy . Here, we describe the use of the zebrafish xenograft model to study early stages of experimental
               micrometastasis formation, engrafting fluorescent tumour cells in transparent zebrafish embryos with
               fluorescent endothelial and immune cells. We propose that targeting CXCR4 signalling on cancer cells or
               in the tumour microenvironment is a valid approach to inhibit metastatic cancer and suggest that anti-
               CXCR4 therapy might have double treatment benefits. In addition, therapeutic modulation of the immune
               system might result in the reinforcement of the immune defence against cancer. However, we suggest that
               treatments designed to target malignant cells might affect tumour microenvironment intrinsic functions.
               Specifically, the intrinsic physiological role of myeloid cells can be affected by cancer treatment, resulting
               in an inability to mount a functional anti-cancer response or, on the other hand, in the ability to mount a
               tumour-supportive response.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Wrote and reviewed the manuscript: Tulotta C, Snaar-Jagalska BE

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               The work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (TOP GO Grant:
               854.10.012).


               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74.
               2.   Klemm F, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of therapeutic response in cancer. Trends Cell Biol 2015;25:198-213.
               3.   Granot Z, Fridlender ZG. Plasticity beyond cancer cells and the “Immunosuppressive Switch”. Cancer Res 2015;75:4441-5.
               4.   Coffelt SB, Kersten K, Doornebal CW, Weiden J, Vrijland K, et al. IL-17-producing gammadelta T cells and neutrophils conspire to
                   promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature 2015;522:345-8.
               5.   Wang J, Knaut H. Chemokine signaling in development and disease. Development 2014;141:4199-205.
               6.   Zlotnik A, Yoshie O. The chemokine superfamily revisited. Immunity 2012;36:705-16.
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28