Page 28 - Read Online
P. 28

Ossoliński et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:1  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.63                     Page 7 of 12

               Table 2. Urine, serum and interstitial fluid metabolites (P < 0.05) sorted by m/z values, chemical formula, chemical class, metabolic
               pathway, cancer to control ratio and P-value
                                                                                           Cancer to
                m/z     Chemical formula        Metabolite*            Metabolic pathway            P-value
                                                                                          control ratio
                Urine
                489.3   [C 27 H 46 O 4 S+H] +  Cholesterol sulfate   Cholesterol metabolism  0.08    0.03
                510.3   [C 23 H 45 N 5 O 5 +K] +  Ile-Ile-Lys-Val and other isomers  Peptide  0.30   0.04
                520.3   [C 21 H 33 N 11 O 5 +H] +  Ala-Arg-His-His and other isomers  Peptide  0.10  0.05
                897.7   [C 55 H 102 O 6 +K] +  Triglyceride (12:0/20:1) and other isomers  Lipid metabolism  10.39  0.04
                Serum
                302.2   [C 16 H 31 NO 4 +H] +  Nonanoylcarnitine     Carnitine-type compound  0.27   0.05
                441.3   [C 22 H 42 O 7 +Na] +  Palmitoyl glucuronide  Fatty acid metabolism  0.33    0.01
                449.3   [C 30 H 50 +H] +  Squalene                   Steroid biosynthesis   0.37     0.01
                455.3   [C 27 H 44 O+K] +  Calcitriol                Steroid biosynthesis   0.47     0.02
                475.2   [C 18 H 30 O 2 +H] +  (9Z, 12Z, 15Z)-octadecatrienoic acid  alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism  0.45  0.01
                999.3   -             unknown                        -                      0.44     0.03
                214.0   [C 6 H 7 O 6 +K] +  Monodehydroascorbate     Ascorbate metabolism   1.77     0.05
                231.0   [C 6 H 12 N 2 O 3 S+K] +  Ala-Cys and other isomers  Peptide        2.77     0.04
                257.0   [C 6 H 8 O 9 S+H] +  Ascorbate 2-sulfate     Ascorbate metabolism   2.13     0.05
                285.0   [C 9 H 10 O 7 S+Na] +  Homovanillicacidsulfate  -                   1.89     0.04
                410.9   [C 4 H 7 O 8 P+H] +  2-Oxo-3-hydroxy-4-phosphobutanoate  Vitamin B 6  metabolism  1.67  0.04
                515.0   [C 10 H 15 N 4 O 13 P 3 +H] +  dITP          Purine metabolism      2.99     0.04
                643.3   [C 32 H 44 N 8 O 5 +Na] +  Arg-Leu-Phe-Trp and other isomers  Peptide  1.71  0.04
                650.9   -             unknown                        -                      2.65     0.03
                711.0   -             unknown                        -                      3.53     0.04
                847.9   -             unknown                        -                      3.73     0.02
                Interstitial fluid
                225.0   [C 7 H 6 O 6 +H] +  Maleylpyruvate           Tyrosine metabolism    0.82     0.05
                307.0   [C 9 H 11 N 2 O 8 P+H] +  3.2’,3’-Cyclic uridine monophosphate  Pyrimidine metabolism  0.61  0.03
                517.2   [C 21 H 36 O 2 +H] +  Pregnanediol           Steroid hormone biosynthesis  0.59  0.01
                632.9   -             unknown                                               0.75     0.01
                751.2   [C 21 H 34 N 10 O 8 +Au] +  Arg-Asp-Gln-His and other isomers  Peptide  0.51  0.03
                754.7   -             unknown                                               0.64     0.03
                799.9   -             unknown                                               0.63     0.01
               *tentative identification

               to the target and ~20 min of measurements. It should be noted that rapid analysis has additional advantages
               such as ability to preserve chemically labile low-molecular weight compounds. Additionally, it is of extreme
               importance that no chemicals were added to the analyzed samples. It is important to state that sample
               preparation was one of the simplest possible in terms of procedure as it required only dilution of unfrozen
               samples. For the first time, in this study, the AuNPET LDI-TOF-MS method was used to study metabolites
               originating from human urine, blood plasma and prostate IF. Methodology of measurements is shown on
               Figure 3.

               The decision not to examine prostate tissue but interstitial fluid was dictated by ethical and technical
               considerations. On one hand, fresh biopsy cores would have to be contained in high vacuum and thus they
               would be unfit for further pathological examination. Another possible analytical solution compatible with
               pathologist’s examination is analysis of formalin-fixed/paraffin embedded cores. Unfortunately, only 40% of
               total metabolites is retained in tissue material for the mentioned type of analysis. In comparison to fresh/
               frozen specimens, it would introduce many contaminants like dimethyl sulfoxide, lauryl sulfate or melanin
                             [24]
               into MS analysis . IF which constitutes tumor microenvironment, often overlooked, has showed to be a
               highly valuable source of potential cancer biomarkers and a potential target for chemoprevention [25,26] .

               Uncontrolled cancer cell proliferation requires efficiency in generation of energy. However, unfavorable
               tumor microenvironment (low level of oxygenation) impose activation of alternative metabolic pathways to
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33