Page 306 - Read Online
P. 306

Page 6 of 9                         Robinson et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:39  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2019.15

               or across disparate stages of breast cancer development, including metastasis. Indeed, TMM selection may
               itself be subject to evolutionary dynamic forces. In addition, the plasticity inherent in TMM identity has far-
               reaching prognostic and therapeutic implications. Tumors driven by distinct TMMs may show sensitivity
               or resistance to specific treatments, which has substantial impact on patient survival. Moreover, different
               subpopulations within a single tumor (e.g., stem vs. non-stem cells) may be reliant upon unique TMMs.
               Such TMM heterogeneity may beget residual, resistant clones that underlie disease recurrence. In the future,
               gaining a deeper understanding of telomeres and the pathways controlled by the telomere machinery will
               provide immense insight into the origin, progression, and eradication of one of the world’s deadliest cancers.



               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               Members of the Schiemann Laboratory are thanked for critical comments and reading of the manuscript.


               Authors’ contributions
               Conception and study design: Robinson NJ, Schiemann WP
               Drafted and revised the manuscript: Robinson NJ, Taylor DJ, Schiemann WP


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               Research support was provided in part by the National Institutes of Health (CA236273) to Schiemann WP,
               (CA186571) to Taylor DJ; and (T32 GM007250 and F30 CA213892) to Robinson NJ. Additional support
               was graciously provided by the METAvivor Foundation (Schiemann WP), and by pilot funding from the
               Case Comprehensive Cancer Center’s Research Innovation Fund, which is supported by the Case Council
               and Friends of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (Schiemann WP), and from the Case Clinical &
               Translational Science Collaborative (Schiemann WP). Finally, Taylor DJ is also supported by the American
               Cancer Society (RSG-13-211-01-DMC).


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and
                   mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424.
               2.   Cianfrocca M, Goldstein LJ. Prognostic and predictive factors in early-stage breast cancer. Oncologist 2004;9:606-16.
               3.   Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 2011;331:1559- 64.
               4.   Fidler IJ. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:453-8.
               5.   Lambert AW, Pattabiraman DR, Weinberg RA. Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell 2017;168:670-91.
               6.   Kim YN, Koo KH, Sung JY, Yun UJ, Kim H. Anoikis resistance: an essential prerequisite for tumor metastasis. Int J Cell Biol
                   2012;2012:306879.
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311