Page 145 - Read Online
P. 145

Park et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:17  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.84                             Page 5 of 12

               with FITC-conjugated antibody to ICAM-1 in the presence of Fc Block for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were then
               washed 3× with PBS and analyzed by FACS Caliber (BD). Data analysis was performed using Flowjo V10
               software (Ashland).

               Monocyte adhesion assay
               Isolated T cells were incubated with Cell Tracker (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at 37 °C and then
                 5
               10  cells per well were incubated on MDA-MB-231LN monolayers in HBSS supplemented with 2 mmol/L
               calcium and magnesium for 1 h. After removing nonadherent cells, the number of Cell Tracker-labeled cells
               bound to the MDA-MB-231LN cells was quantified under fluorescent microscopy.


               Immunohistochemistry
               Tissue samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and then 4-µm sections were
               prepared. Sections were de-waxed and a steamer pre-treatment in Tris/EDTA buffer (DAKO) was performed.
               Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by incubation in 3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS. For blocking
               steps, avidin (Sigma-Aldrich), biotin (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS, and a super block (IDlabs Biotechnology) were
               used. Rabbit monoclonal AF1q antibody and mouse monoclonal ICAM-1 antibody in a 1:200 dilution were
               incubated at 4 °C overnight. IHC detection was performed with the IDetect Super Stain System HRP (IDlabs
               Biotechnology). Specific signals were amplified using 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (IDlabs Biotechnology)
               under visual control, followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin.

               Statistical analysis
               Quantitative data are presented as means ± SD and were subjected to analysis of variance followed by a t test
               with the use of Prism V.7 software (GraphPad Software). A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically
               significant.



               RESULTS
               Next-generation sequencing and transcriptome data analysis
               We observed AF1q, a metastasis enhancer, was highly expressed in metastatic cells, MDA-MB-231LN
               (invasive subline from MDA-MB-231), than in the primary tumor cells (MDA-MB-231) [Figure 1A]. To
               validate the results of RNA-seq, we performed RT-qPCR analysis using randomly selected genes [Figure 1B].
               Both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-231LN cell lines were subjected to RNA-Seq analysis with three biological
               replicates for each cell line. The 75 bp-long single-end sequencing reads were mapped to the human genomic
               reference using STAR aligner. More than 27.7 million sequencing reads were mapped to genome on each
               replicate (averaging 35.3 million mapped reads) [Supplementary Table 1]. Out of the 58,289 annotated genes,
               18,042 (31.0%) by Ensemble were expressed with more than 10 read counts on at least one of our replicates
               [Supplementary Table 2]. Only uniquely mapped reads were used further for searching differentially
               expressed genes using Cuffdiff. Total 1,485 genes were selected as significantly differentially expressed with
               the criteria explained above. Among those, 762 genes showed increased value of RPKM in MDA-MB-231LN
               cell line compared to MDA-MB-231 and 723 genes showed the opposite. Row-scaled RPKM value of each
               replicate represents that the differential expression of genes is consistent throughout replicates of each cell
               line [Figure 1C].


               With those differentially expressed genes, pathway analysis was performed using Metacore. By selecting
               top 40 network objects resulted from the pathway analysis [Table 1], direct interaction network building
               algorithm was applied. Interestingly, pathway process showed that most genes were directly linked with
               ICAM-1 [Figure 2A]. In addition, we found out that ICAM-1 transcript level was significantly decreased in
               MDA-MB-231LN cell line compared to MDA-MB-231 confirming that ICAM-1 expression is attenuated in
               metastatic cell line [Figure 2B].

               To explore the relationship of AF1q with ICAM-1 in breast cancer, we used 1,222 RNA-seq data of 1,092
               breast cancer cases from TCGA database. Using FPKM values from all 1,222 samples, the expression level of
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150