Page 30 - Read Online
P. 30

Page 10 of 12                           Khan et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:71  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2019.017

               As compared with fluid restriction, lithium and urea, vaptans offer a therapeutic option that is patho-
                                                      [41]
               physiologically focused, potent and effective . Despite efficacy of vaptans in improving serum sodium,
               clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia do not recommend the use of
                                                                                    [23]
               vaptans due to concern for overcorrection of sodium and lack of mortality benefit . The safety and efficacy
               of tolvaptan was evaluated in a post hoc subgroup analysis of the patients with cancer in SALT-1 (study of
               ascending levels of tolvaptan in hyponatremia) and SALT-2 clinical trials. Baseline sodium in the cohort
               of the SALT trials was 130 mEq/L. A 15 mg dose of tolvaptan was titrated up to 30 or 60 mg over 4 days
               if the increase in serum sodium was < 5 mEq/L in the prior 24 h. Tolvaptan was withheld or reduced and
               fluid intake was increased if serum sodium was > 145 mEq/L. Serum sodium normalized to > 135 mEq/L
               in 66.6% of the patients by day 30. Serum sodium exceeded the desired rate of correction (> 8 mEq/L over
               the first 8 h of therapy or > 12 mEq/L over 24 h) in 1.8% of patients. None of these patients developed any
                                                       [6]
               symptoms of osmotic demyelination syndrome .
               In our experience, vaptans are well tolerated by cancer patients and offer a therapeutic option in patients
               with euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia when fluid restriction alone is insufficient to increase
               serum sodium levels or to avoid the discomfort associated with fluid restriction. Although the vaptans
               are well tolerated and effective, their high cost continues to be a limitation for routine use. In a post hoc
               analysis, economic models from SALT-1, SALT-2 and EVERST reported decrease in length of stay in
                                                                 [44]
               the hospital and hospital cost savings with tolvaptan use . To reduce the risk of hyponatremia all i.v.
               medications should be concentrated and hypotonic i.v. fluids should be avoided in hospitalized patients,
                                                                                          [45]
               e.g., perioperatively, during cancer chemotherapy, bronchitis, pneumonia or lung disease .

               CONCLUSION
               Oncology patients with hyponatremia need close monitoring of fluid intake and output to prevent
               derangements in salt and volume balance. Hyponatremia in cancer patients is associated with advanced
                                                                                                [9]
               disease and poor prognosis. Improvement in serum sodium correlates with improved survival . Whether
               the treatment of hyponatremia improves overall survival needs to be investigated. Proposed algorithms for
               the management of hyponatremia could be utilized in patients with cancer, recognizing that hyponatremia
               is of diverse etiology in this population. Use of therapeutic agents such as the vaptans offer a convenient,
               effective, and targeted approach to the management of hyponatremia. Further studies are likely to clarify
               cost effectiveness and safety concerns related to vaptan use in cancer patients.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: Khan MI
               Provided critical edits to the manuscript: Waguespack SG, Ahmed I
               Approved the final version of the manuscript: Khan MI, Waguespack SG, Ahmed I


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               Not applicable.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35