Page 168 - Read Online
P. 168

Page 6 of 10                         Komatsu et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2018;4:36  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2017.58

                      [101]
               mimics . Various efforts have been made to develop miRNA-based therapies in the past several years, and
               two studies have shown particular promise. The first study focused on the therapeutic silencing of disease-
               associated miRNAs using miRNA inhibitors. Miravirsen (Santaris Pharma) is one of several promising
               miRNA inhibitors; it can bind to miR-122 and inhibit its biogenesis. Miravirsen was developed for the
               treatment of hepatitis C and is currently under evaluation in clinical trials [65-67] . The second study examined
               therapeutic miRNA-based drugs through the use of synthetic miRNA mimics. Recently, a phase I clinical
                                                                                    [68]
               trial using the miRNA mimic MIRX34 (Mirna Therapeutics, Inc.) was performed . MIRX34 is a synthetic
               miRNA mimic of the tumor suppressor miR-34 and was administered to patients with primary or metastatic
               liver cancer. This trial was ended because of serious adverse immune-related effects. The administration
               of tumor-suppressor miRNA mimics continues to bear undesirable risks and negative, unexpected
               physiological effects because multiple genes, regulating multiple biological functions, can be impacted by
               miRNAs. Restoring tumor-suppressor miRNAs, which are abundantly detected in the plasma/serum of
               healthy individuals but lowered in patients with cancer [Table 2], may minimize the physiological risks of
               systemic administration. We recently reported that restoring and maintaining the miR-107 plasma level
                                                         [61]
               significantly inhibited tumor progression in mice . The systemic delivery of tumor-suppressor miRNAs in
               gastric cancer patients may thus provide significant advantages because effects can be repeatedly examined
               repeatedly using blood-based miRNA levels.


               CONCLUSION
               The development of liquid biopsy-based analyses could improve diagnosis and therapy for patients with
               gastric cancer. As a liquid biopsy, circulating miRNAs have the potential to diagnose gastric cancer at an
               early stage, predict prognosis and recurrence, evaluate patient status and therapeutic efficacy, and provide
               optimal, individualized treatment strategies. It should be noted that the present review is limited by
               examining a relatively small number of retrospective cohort studies. Additional research with large cohorts
               or prospective clinical trials with longer follow-up periods are therefore necessary to confirm the usefulness
               of candidate miRNAs. Translation into clinically useful gastric cancer treatments also requires significant
               additional work. The physiological effects of tumor-suppressor miRNAs must be examined in greater detail
               before they can be safely administered systemically, and their tumor-suppressive functions must be validated
               in vivo before clinical use. Delivery systems for miRNAs must be further refined to surmount problems such
               as cellular uptake and bloodstream stability. Finally, more powerful anticancer tumor-suppressor miRNAs
               should be found by examining the plasma of patients with different cancers, through methods such as
               microarray analysis, next-generation sequencing, and digital PCR-based approaches. Currently under
               evaluation, these strategies will likely provide the future’s next innovations.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Designed the research and wrote the paper: Komatsu S
               Collected the data and performed data analyses: Komatsu S, Kiuchi J, Imamura T
               Reviewed the paper: Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Otsuji E


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflict of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173