Page 88 - Read Online
P. 88

Page 394                                                        Wang et al. Intell Robot 2022;2(4):391-406  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2022.25












































                                                   Figure 1. Research framework.

               The use of intelligent information processing methods to remove background noise, capture multiscale and
               diverse representation information, and extract its related sensitive features is the basis for detecting
               concrete bridge cracks.


               In the aspect of feature extraction for concrete bridge cracks, the traditional classical methods include
               principal component analysis (PCA), sparse decomposition, wavelet transform (WT), and adaptive neural
               fuzzy inference system (ANFIS).


               PCA obtains different principal components via the matrix transformation of signals, arranges the sizes of
               the principal components according to the variance, and compares the contribution rate of each component
               with the threshold value, thus realizing effective feature extraction [29,30] . In the research on concrete structure
               crack recognition based on multiple image features, Yu et al. collected 1200 bridge crack images and
               employed integral projection and PCA to extract effective features sensitive to the crack for crack edge
                       [31]
               detection . Mei et al. collected acceleration data from all the vehicles within a certain period and extracted
               the transformed features that are related to bridge damage with Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and
               PCA to identify the damage by comparing the distributions of these transformed features . PCA is a widely
                                                                                          [32]
               utilized method to remove noise and extract effective features, but it cannot accurately analyze the real
               subspace structure of data.
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93