Page 34 - Read Online
P. 34

Sun et al. Intell Robot 2023;3(3):257-73  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2023.17   Page 261


                                              66 (7& VFKHPH
                                                     <HV  (QFRXUDJH   'HFUHDVH WKH
                                             ,V LW IDU DZD\   WUDQVPLVVLRQV  WKUHVKROG
                                             IURP UHIHUHQFHG
                                       3K\VLFDO VWDWH  VLJQDO "   6XSSUHVV   ,QFUHDVH WKH   (YHQW WKUHVKROG
                                                      1R  WUDQVPLVVLRQV  WKUHVKROG

                                                Figure 2. The basic idea of the SS-ETC.


               where

                                           0               0                 
                                                                0
                                                                            1  
                                                                             
                                          0  0   0    1       0       −  (  )     
                                         =               ,    =   ,   (  ) =   
                                          0  0     11     12      1         2  
                                                                             
                                           0  0     21     22       2         3  
                                                                             
                                                           
               Here, the disturbance   (  ) = [   1 , −  (  )      ,    2 ,    3 ] with modeling errors    1,    2, and    3.
               For the purpose of achieving a better understanding of the proposed SS-ETC framework, the following general
               assumptions are given first.
               Assumption 1 The sensors are time triggered with a fixed sampling period ℎ. Then, the sampling set S 1 =
               {0, ℎ, 2ℎ, · · · ,   ℎ} is assumed for all    ∈ N under a sampled-data framework.
               Assumption 2 UndertheETCscheme, notallthesampleddatawouldbetransmitted. Therefore, onecanassume
               that the set of successfully transmitted samples is S 2 = {0,    1 ℎ,    2 ℎ, · · · ,       ℎ}. Obviously, S 2 ⊆ S 1.
               Assumption 3 The controllers and actuators are event-triggered. Then the control input at the actuator is gener-
                                                                                           isthetransmission
               atedbyazero-orderholder(ZOH)withitsholdinginterval    ∈ [      ℎ+          ,      +1 ℎ+        +1  ). Here,         
               delay.
               Remark 1 The main difference between S 1 and S 2 lies in the fact that not all the sampled data would be transmit-
               ted for the ETC scheme. In fact, if S 1 = S 2, it means that all sampled data are transmitted, and the event-triggered
               transmission becomes a time-triggered transmission for Assumption. 2.

               2.2. SS-ETC scheme
               The basic idea of the proposed SS-ETC scheme, which adjusts its event-triggered threshold according to the
               received state measurement, is captured by Figure 2.


               The properties of the SS-ETC can be attributed to the following two cases:
                • When a larger state measurement ||  (      ℎ)|| is received, the SS-ETC scheme deems that the physical system
                  becomes unstable, and it would encourage transmissions to stabilize the physical system with a higher
                  control frequency. Then a lower event-triggered is adopted.
                • Whenasmallerstatemeasurement ||  (      ℎ)|| isreceived, theSS-ETCschemedeemsthatthephysicalsystem
                  is stable, and some unnecessary transmissions can be reduced. Then an upper event-triggered threshold is
                  maintained.
               In order to highlight the SS-ETC scheme, we begin by introducing the following barrier-like function:

                                                                 
                                                          (  ) =                                        (3)
                                                                 +   
               where    and    are given positive constants, and    ≥ 0 is an independent variable.

               From (3), the following facts can be easily obtained:
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39