Page 24 - Read Online
P. 24

Page 216                           Li et al. Intell Robot 2023;3(2):213-21  I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ir.2023.13

               formed bythe leader andthe follower, wherethe set ofnodes V = {0, 1} andthe set ofedges E(  (  )) ⊆ V ×V.

                                                                                           0     0  ∈ R ,
                                                                                                       2×2
               Denote the neighbors of the   th agent by N    (  (  )). The adjacency matrix A(  (  )) =
                                                                                          10 (   (  ))  0
               where if 0 ∈ N 1 (  (  )), then    10 (  (  )) = 1, otherwise    10 (  (  )) = 0. The Laplacian matrix of G (  (  )) is given
               by L(  (  )) = D(  (  )) − A(  (  )), where D(  (  )) = diag(0,    10 (  (  ))). Without losing generality, we assume

                                                                              −      
               that the transition rate matrix of the Markov chain   (  ) is the matrix    =  , where    represents the
                                                                                   −  
               transition rate from the unconnected graph to the connected graph;    represents the transition rate from the
               connected graph to the unconnected graph.


               3. ADMISSIBLE DISTRIBUTED COOPERATIVE CONTROL STRATEGY
               In the real network, the relative state measurement information obtained by the follower from the leader is
               often affected by noises. Therefore, for the leader−following multi-agent system (1)−(2), we assume that the
               relative state measurement information has the following form

                                         10 (  ) =    1 (  ) −    0 (  ) +    10 (   1 (  ) −    0 (  ))    10 (  ),  (3)

               where    10 (  ) representsthemultiplicativemeasurementnoise, and    10 representstheintensityofmultiplicative
               measurement noise.

               We consider the following set of admissible distributed cooperative control strategies based on (3) and the
               randomness of the communication topology

                                     U = {   = {  (  ) =      10 (  (  ))   10 (  ),    > 0} ,    ∈ R} .  (4)


               This paper primarily focuses on investigating the necessary and sufficient conditions for the cooperatability of
               the first-order leader-following multi-agent systems. These systems are composed of a leader and a follower
               and are subjected to multiplicative noises under Markov switching topologies.

               The assumption and lemma required in this section are given below.


                                                      ¯    
               Assumption1 The noise process    10 (  ) satisfies  0     10 (  )d   =    10 (  ),    ⩾ 0, where    10 (  ) is a one-dimensional
               standard Brownian motion.

               Lemma 1 [12]  The solution of the Markov switching stochastic differential equations

                                         d  (  ) =   (  (  ))  (  )d   +   (  (  ))  (  )d  (  )        (5)

               is mean square stable if and only if    = diag(  (1) ⊕   (1), . . . ,   (  ) ⊕   (  )) + diag(  (1) ⊕   (1), . . . ,   (  ) ⊕
                 (  )) +    ⊗    2 is a Hurwitz matrix, where    = [        ] 1⩽  ,  ⩽   is the transition rate matrix of the Markov chain
                        T
                              
                 (  ). If   (  ) =   , we denote   (  (  )) =   (  ),   (  (  )) =   (  ), and    = 1, . . . ,   .

               4. MAIN RESULTS
               Byleveragingthestabilitytheory ofstochasticdifferential equationswith MarkovianswitchingandtheMarkov
               chain theory, we provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for the cooperatability of the leader-following
               multi-agent systems.

               Theorem 1 Suppose Assumption 1 is satisfied. In that case, there exists an admissible cooperative control
               strategy denoted by    ∈ U, which ensures that the follower can track the leader for any initial value under
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29