Page 624 - Read Online
P. 624

Ichida et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:54  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.59                                           Page 9 of 11
                                                                                                  [15]
               model was developed in Korea, i.e., the MoRAL score, using only serum levels of AFP and DCP , which
               was shown to be more effective than the Milan criteria in predicting recurrence after LT. While DCP is
               criticized for not being a routine laboratory test in the West and for its dependence on vitamin K status and
               warfarin administration in clinical settings, reports from Asia as well as the present study warrant further
               study on the DCP in predicting HCC recurrence after LT.


               NLR and PLR are indicators of inflammatory status previously reported as prognostic markers for the
               recurrence of various cancers, including HCC [16,17] . As the usefulness of NLR has been presented in
               both DDLT and LDLT settings [40,41] , NLR is incorporated in some prognostic models [14,42] . Although the
               usefulness of PLR has also been reported since 2012, supporting evidence is still limited [40,41] . NLR and
               PLR were not as useful as AFP, AFP-L3, and DCP in predicting HCC recurrence after LT in the present
               study [Figure 2, Table 2, Supplementary Figure 2]. One of the drawbacks of these inflammatory markers
               may be the inconstant nature of neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts. This is more so in cirrhotic
               patients who suffer from portal hypertension, splenomegaly, and consequently, pancytopenia. As for other
               biomarkers, we could not evaluate the usefulness of FDG-PET, one of the promising biomarkers reported
               previously [18,19] , because FDG-PET was not routinely performed at our institute.

               Our analysis has several weaknesses related to its retrospective design and the limited number of patients
               included. Both the present and the national cohorts used in the establishment of the 5-5-500 criteria
               were based on the long time-course with a considerable number of cases from nearly 20 years ago. As
               the developments and advances in imaging modalities, anti-viral treatments, and immunosuppression
               regimens might have changed practice in the management of LT considerably over the last two decades,
               it seems mandatory to validate the criteria in the recent cohort or in the prospective study. Although the
                                                                            [43]
               usefulness of tumor downstaging before LT has been reported recently , unfortunately there was no case
               of intentional downstaging in the present cohort. In Japan, where the indication of LT for HCC is restricted
               to those with decompensated cirrhosis by the national insurance system, HCC patients with compensated
               cirrhosis are usually recommended for locoregional treatments and will be referred for LT when they
               develop decompensated cirrhosis not amenable to locoregional treatments. The downstaging strategy for
               those beyond the selection criteria and the expansion of the indication criteria are two opposite ways to
               expand the indication of LT for candidates, which should be compared and discussed in future studies.

               In conclusion, the present study suggests that both the 5-5-500 criteria and the Japanese DEC are
               appropriate for patients with HCC in LDLT. AFP, including AFP-L3, was demonstrated to be a reliable
               biomarker and could reasonably be incorporated into the expanded selection criteria. Further validation
               with more recent cases and a prospective study is warranted.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Conception and design: Ichida A, Akamatsu N
               Provision of study materials or patients: Ichida A
               Collection and assembly of data: Ichida A, Akamatsu N
               Data analysis and interpretation: Ichida A, Akamatsu N
               Manuscript writing: Ichida A, Akamatsu N, Hasegawa K
               Final approval of manuscript: Ichida A, Akamatsu N, Hasegawa K

               Availability of data and materials
               The data used in the present study were submitted to the journal.
   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629